Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 221 total)
Agree....just remember a few things:
1. Make sure your dimension columns being updated have been defined as Flexible.
2. You may be surprised at how much time this may take as any...
January 29, 2014 at 10:37 am
I agree with Phil's approach.
SELECT
EXCEPT
SELECT
is a tried and true way of doing a column specific "table diff". I use hashing as a last resort for extremely large and wide dimensions...
January 29, 2014 at 10:30 am
H2 the Izzo!
Is this the predecessor or inspiration for Management Data Warehouse (MDW)?
January 29, 2014 at 9:42 am
I was running SSMS on my laptop as both the laptop admin and the SQL sysadmin when this happened. I even pasted the file path in windows explorer and the...
January 28, 2014 at 8:08 am
L' Eomot Inversé (1/27/2014)
Straightforward question. I wish everything about SSAS was this easy, I might end up understanding it if it were.
You are certainly not alone.
Thinking in multidimensional...
January 27, 2014 at 3:52 pm
I still cannot figure it out, but we used a workaround by creating a SQL Agent Job and having our launching application execute sp_update_job and sp_start_job.
However, I would still LOVE...
January 27, 2014 at 3:39 pm
"GET IT" AND HAVE THE RESOURCES/SMARTS...........this was a SQL AND....not an OR to be taken out of context. 🙂
January 27, 2014 at 11:03 am
The Cardinals and the Red Sox are the only ones that seem to "GET IT" AND HAVE THE RESOURCES/SMARTS available to quickly dig themselves out of an overpayment mistake--and compete/overachieve...
January 27, 2014 at 10:20 am
Although I was not the original topic posting, I guess I may have misinterpreted something. My fault.
January 27, 2014 at 9:53 am
Does this query assume the latest identity value is the greatest?
I once had a BI client that reached the highest integer value possible in an identity column. This client...
January 27, 2014 at 9:19 am
A Monday morning LOB ball.....a gift from above.
January 27, 2014 at 8:56 am
Haha...I THOUGHT you were going to say:
"The fact that you NEEDED 3 phases proves my point."
That's close enough 😉
January 24, 2014 at 2:48 pm
MS definitely did a decent job of giving you backwards compatibility. We did our migration in three rather painless phases.
1. Co-opt with the main RDBMS migration.....doing the bare minimum conversion...
January 24, 2014 at 11:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 221 total)