Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
Rod at work (6/29/2016)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (6/28/2016)
porter.james (6/28/2016)
June 29, 2016 at 7:49 am
As much as I'd like to think our organization could use more data scientists, the reality is that the most accurate statistical models delivered by my colleagues were rejected by...
June 28, 2016 at 7:25 am
Seems like there are many more cost-effective ways to handle old, infrequently-accessed data--for example, unloading data to Amazon S3 or Glacier. Stretch is maybe more convenient to manage... but I...
June 15, 2016 at 8:19 pm
and not be a prima donna.
Again... every time you try to claim that you're not sexist & defend your (rather tangential) point, you use gendered insults to refer to job...
May 31, 2016 at 2:27 pm
Interesting that in a thread about bias you'd be using sexist language like "man up princess"...
May 27, 2016 at 2:13 pm
In my workplaces I've occasionally seen "lacks communication skills" or "fitting in with the team" used as euphemisms to refer to candidates who speak with an accent or come from...
May 27, 2016 at 7:44 am
I've noticed this problem a lot regarding data warehousing--people use the jargon but have a vague idea of what it means.
For example, a consultant with 20+ years of experience comes...
May 2, 2016 at 9:18 am
A quick google search returned no relevant results explaining this property. Perhaps this is something Microsoft could do better to document.
November 13, 2015 at 6:08 am
Yeah, I think you generally "should" avoid writing code that is syntactically incorrect 🙂
November 4, 2015 at 6:42 am
this is the part where i pretend i know what "may" is in dutch, and guess right 🙂
October 19, 2015 at 7:51 am
Appreciated this question--I seldom think to use CROSS APPLY in that way. I'd be curious what the execution plans look like for this type of a join (does it need...
October 15, 2015 at 9:06 am
got it right by sheer luck... still have no idea what federations are, since i don't use azure 🙂
October 2, 2015 at 8:39 am
Yep, never used this one & can't think of a good reason to 🙂
September 23, 2015 at 7:35 am
I'm not sure "reducing CXPACKET waits" is really a good goal to have, unless you suspect that the query would be more efficient with less parallelism... I think of CXPACKET...
September 21, 2015 at 10:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)