Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 106 total)
Did the question make you think?
If the answer was given as 'INNER' instead of 'MIDDLE', wouldn't you just have picked that without bothering to check?
I can't speak for anyone else...
October 21, 2004 at 3:50 am
Although I got the right answer, it is not true to say that the results exactly match the results of sp_who
sp_who resolves the database name (dbname) correctly whereas the query...
October 20, 2004 at 5:22 am
Four pages of comments - all the same
Doesn't anybody read previous comments before blithely jumping in and stating the obvious
October 14, 2004 at 8:34 am
Well I'd better start it up again then
How can a question like this get through QA ? I'm really upset - It's hard enough...
October 14, 2004 at 3:42 am
Guys, I appreciate that the question was not worded correctly but you should be getting used to these by now
You could have guessed that...
October 14, 2004 at 3:15 am
I have the answer!
If the connection is made through TCP/IP, the nt_username and nt_domain columns are empty.
If the connection is made through named...
October 13, 2004 at 3:13 am
Thanks for you replies but I am, unfortunately, still no nearer finding a solution. SUSER_NAME() and SUSER_SNAME() both return the login user, not the NT user name.
Also, it is not...
October 13, 2004 at 3:05 am
How bizarre to have a question on an unreleased product
October 12, 2004 at 3:27 am
Sorry - tried this again from SEM instead of query analyser (after reading the question a little more carefully!)
Agree with results as previously posted - however, I feel that this...
October 5, 2004 at 3:42 am
Sorry Ed. I can't agree your results. Both queries work fine. I tested them both.
I think this "BUG" is not in all installations of SQL 2000 - ergo the question...
October 5, 2004 at 3:29 am
I agree. I can't find any differences between 3 and 4.
Both turn on ANSI_NULLS for the duration of the query.
Furthermore, I can't agree with the link to the BUG. Is...
October 5, 2004 at 3:26 am
I take it all back on the basis that I cannot now replicate
I rebuilt the query from scratch and got the expected results that...
September 20, 2004 at 10:06 am
I take it all back on the basis that I cannot now replicate
I rebuilt the query from scratch and got the expected results that...
September 20, 2004 at 10:05 am
Hi Gregory. Yes agreed, 2 returned. However, as the question says, are you relying on the fact that the order of the data in table B is ordered as 1,...
September 20, 2004 at 5:58 am
Despite the typo, I assumed that the second query was the result of #TestUpdateB.
I assumed the answer would be 'cannot be determined' but I did a little test beforehand. I...
September 20, 2004 at 5:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 106 total)