Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Homebrew1, thanks for the question back. I checked with the vendor and just recently they approved SP3. Maybe that's what we need to do to get around this problem. I...
September 15, 2011 at 6:54 am
Thanks for the heads up on the summary.txt file. It displays the error :
MSI (s) (A0!8C) [19:04:09:615]: Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 -- Error 29512. SQL Server Setup was...
September 13, 2011 at 7:58 am
Thanks for the link, Adiga. I will get SPs in line first and then try maintenance plan without SSIS loaded.
August 5, 2010 at 5:43 am
I know I have to get the versions so they're the same ; I'm trying to get the vendor to agree to SQL 2005 SP3 for both servers. The server...
August 4, 2010 at 2:00 pm
We now have the .mdf and .ldf files for the production db and tempdb all on separate disk arrays. The .mdf is a Raid 1 + 0 configuration spread over...
November 18, 2008 at 6:56 am
Well, so far, so good. We have made it through our first month end closing with barely a word from the user community about poor performance. This is the first...
November 17, 2008 at 11:55 am
Thank you both for your input. Points well taken. We did have in our plan to move tempdb, .ldf and .mdf to separate volumes. It was the multiple file proposal...
October 23, 2008 at 11:19 am
Jack,
Thanks for the opinion. So, if I'm reading you right, data access is data access regardless if it's "minimal". Our vendor is...
September 18, 2008 at 10:41 am
Thanks to everyone for their comments on our issue ... This particular one seemed to be the solution, at least it seems to be. We noticed that when our BU...
January 8, 2008 at 6:13 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)