Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
I didn't get the idea of this article.
Good to know the mathematical theory to deal with the problem.
But when you don't mention the TSQL function that handles this situation (
January 5, 2024 at 3:40 pm
@cschnaars, where do I click to LIKE your comment?
One thing that really annoys me in this community is that bunch of smart asses taking every opportunity to criticize...
October 29, 2015 at 6:14 am
thx for sharing, Patrick
I always complain how hard it is to find practical uses of the CROSS JOIN and you showed us a nice example.
November 12, 2013 at 10:21 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (3/4/2011)
I have submitted a note to WordPress to remove this.
Steve
I wasn't aware of this kind of problem, but I am surprised to see how frequent...
March 4, 2011 at 9:57 am
Men, I didn't know how common those "reprints" were!!
I checked Google and found 3 of my articles shown in some "serious" blogs out there. And 1 one of them...
March 4, 2011 at 2:26 am
Zielyn (3/3/2011)
Just curious, who came up with article first?
Well, I can tell you Mauro showed me his article in January/2011 if that helps you find an answer π
BTW,...
March 3, 2011 at 2:15 pm
rob
relation is a term we generally use in academic environment and I guess this was the word Ed Codd used when he define the basics for relational modeling.
in day-top-day...
February 28, 2011 at 6:23 am
SQLkiwi (2/27/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/27/2011)
February 28, 2011 at 3:47 am
James
The SQL statement was supposed to do it from the first to the last join. Actually I understand that's the way things worked out in old RDMBSs.
But SQL SERVER...
February 27, 2011 at 2:08 pm
Permap
Good catch! I'm correcting it now.
Thx
February 26, 2011 at 4:14 pm
Sunny
Usually the query optimizer will evaluate the different sequences when defining the execution plan. So, considering standard situations, your query's performance will be same in both cases.
February 25, 2011 at 7:32 am
Nils
Thanks for your comments. You know this 2nd article is in my list, hope I have time to work on it soon π
February 25, 2011 at 6:55 am
Good catch... I've never thought about it.
Great article. Short and perfectly clear.
Thank you!
December 1, 2010 at 5:00 am
David Portas (10/26/2010) you are not comparing like for like
David
I understand your opinion, but I do not agree. I think the most difficult thing when talking about performance is exactly...
October 26, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Victor Kirkpatrick (10/25/2010)
...unlike what the author said about "overhead" using surrogate keys....
Victor
I'd like to bring the word "overhead" to the context I used it in my article. I compared a...
October 25, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)