Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)
I'll be there! Attending SQL 2014 pre-con on Thu and all day Fri. Sadly have to miss the Saturday for a wedding - how inconsiderate!
July 15, 2014 at 8:12 am
There are a number of problems with that piece of code (and this is just what I can see via my phone):
- the date parameters are not used in...
July 10, 2014 at 3:08 pm
Hmm I still can't quite tell (I'm away from keyboard this week an only have phone!). The two LEFT JOINs might be an issue, remove them one by one...
July 8, 2014 at 12:32 am
As I can't see your data, it's hard to tell where the duplicates are coming in. Can you post an example of the duplicate data? Anonymise your actual...
July 7, 2014 at 10:19 am
Well you can change the column definition in the #contacts temp table to allow NULLs, but this does again question your data quality.
July 7, 2014 at 8:29 am
The main problem with this proc is that you reference the CTE twice. SQL Server will process that twice because CTEs behave like views rather than temp tables. ...
July 3, 2014 at 9:01 am
Just to state the obvious, but have you deployed the Attunity connectors on the Win 2008 box?
We have these working in our environment but I do remember it being a...
June 30, 2014 at 3:10 pm
If the OP has just restored the database from SQL 2008 R2 to SQL 2014, then the compatibility mode (and therefore cardinality estimation model) will remain as 100, ie the...
June 11, 2014 at 5:23 am
You can do what you describe, it's called Composable DML. This is much more powerful with the MERGE statement where you can access columns from the inner MERGE which...
May 28, 2014 at 5:19 pm
First of all, try it. Have you got an MSDN subscription? Or make use of the free trial. You have spin up a trial SQL Server 2014...
May 26, 2014 at 6:13 am
Superstitious, anecdotal reasons for not upgrading, OR known workload, trialled extensively on comparable proof-of-concept kit? Hide until 2017, OR clearly attempt to identify positives and negatives. Specific tests...
May 12, 2014 at 4:04 pm
I think this query would be a lot easier if you had a normalized table structure ( FY, ObjSub, Dept, Period, Value ) and a calendar table, but if that...
April 6, 2014 at 7:09 am
OK scaled up my Azure VM to 8 core / 14GB and the rows to 50 million. Created similar(ish) test rigs for: normal table, columnstore, in-memory OLTP table and...
April 3, 2014 at 4:58 pm
See my reply here on a similar issue:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1557258-3411-2.aspx
April 3, 2014 at 12:26 pm
I did find some evidence that an index hint on a range index running in a natively compiled proc was the quickest, but results seemed a bit variable. For...
April 3, 2014 at 12:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)