Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 46 total)
I tried the same query on a testing machine, it was the only query reported by sp_whoisactive, with the same 'runnable' status, but there was nothing else 'running'.
I always...
February 20, 2013 at 2:37 pm
It seems I found a solution but it is really weird....
I assumed that if I have Windows 2008 on 64bits and SQL Server 2008 on 64bit then I should use...
March 20, 2012 at 8:59 am
Nobody has any idea about this? How is it possible to debug this issue? I suppose I should check if some DLL's are registered or not, or maybe something else?
March 19, 2012 at 10:07 pm
I have to prevent escalating because this causes deadlocks in queries like :
INSERT INTO table_name ...blablabla... and this is not acceptable 🙁
January 12, 2012 at 1:57 pm
I agree it is probably the most weird request ever, it is a request from a client ...
They need one Excel column for each row in the dataset, and at...
September 13, 2011 at 9:53 am
I didn't post a specific DDL because I was trying to find out if there is a general solution better than just writing a cursor-based SP of my own...
The schema...
September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
You would loose your money Sir, because I moved very carefully all the jobs before the full backup.
And besides this, I inspected the "job history" with the log viewer...
August 22, 2011 at 8:35 am
This is definitely a very good solution, THANK YOU!
I was looking for a hint to force the execution of subquery first, but I suppose there isn't one, so your solution...
July 27, 2011 at 10:48 am
I have to answer it - just a RAISERROR with a lower severity ....
:w00t: :w00t:
July 6, 2011 at 1:12 pm
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN SUBSTRING(Field,2,1)='D' THEN 'A' + SUBSTRING(Field,1,1)
WHEN SUBSTRING(Field,2,1)='W' THEN 'B' + SUBSTRING(Field,1,1)
...
June 1, 2011 at 11:50 pm
SELECT ... ORDER BY REVERSE(field) should do the job if I got this right.
After all, even if the field is a combination of int+char, the result is a char..
Which is...
June 1, 2011 at 11:30 pm
Thank you, tt works just perfect!
Excuse my ignorance, but what's a "Quirky Update" ?
May 2, 2011 at 8:38 am
Performance is not an issue in this case, I am just curious if just a set based solution is possible for this
May 1, 2011 at 11:34 pm
I just have to partition (not group) the orders in partitions that have the total amount of a partition of maximum $3,000.
May 1, 2011 at 11:32 pm
I found the answer - it is pretty simple - just restarting the sql service fixed the problem...
December 16, 2010 at 12:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 46 total)