Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Thanks Jeff for your reply. As you have mentioned, this method hits the performance very badly. Is there any other way of doing it?
November 20, 2011 at 8:22 pm
#1410466
Hi,
I have tried out this. I still observed truncate\insert is much faster that incremental load using MD5 process. For 800000 records, truncate\insert took 33sec to load while incremental process took...
June 10, 2010 at 4:06 am
#1178522
As per my knowledge we can dynamically change the connection strings using Configuration(.Config) files.
April 28, 2008 at 7:07 am
#807732