Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 170 total)
I could think of simple option here is-
Declare @name varchar(100)
set @name = 'count'
SELECT c1
FROM mytbl2
WHERE
c1 LIKE '% '+@name
or
c1 LIKE @name+' %'
or
c1 LIKE '% '+@name+'...
March 19, 2010 at 1:23 am
This is interesting one.
March 19, 2010 at 1:10 am
Its working fine at my end. Please check you created function in the same database.
March 18, 2010 at 7:56 am
Yes collate clause is required if user database collation is different than server collation.
Tempdb database follows the same collation as server collation. If some query operation uses tempdb then.....
March 18, 2010 at 7:43 am
SCPTXFR.EXE utility was available in SQL Server 2000. It is not available in 2005/2008. :hehe:
March 18, 2010 at 7:16 am
Best normalized form could be
TABLE 1 {This is product code master}
Product Codes | Item Number
TABLE 2 {This is product group master}
Product Group ID | Product Group
TABLE 3 ...
March 18, 2010 at 7:08 am
Execution plan is prepared based on indexes on table. It depends on the memory availability whether it will keep in memory or not.
If the plan is cached in memory execution...
March 18, 2010 at 7:01 am
If you disable primary key of unique index to which foreign key references; foreign key will get disabled. Not sure this will allow you to use TRUNCATE command.
Alternately-
You...
March 18, 2010 at 4:38 am
Its issue of parameter sniffing
You can explore with RECOMPILE option.
March 18, 2010 at 4:30 am
Yes second option is correct. it will keep on incrementing from the last IDENTITY value.
March 17, 2010 at 9:05 am
If server reboot also did not solve your problem means there is some issue with the processes running on the server or with in the database which are consuming more...
March 17, 2010 at 8:26 am
Its not issue of 32 or 64 bit.
You can not restore 2008 database on 2005 server.
You can try doing one thing-
Change database compatibility level to 2005, then...
March 17, 2010 at 8:19 am
Please read from SQL Server books online. Both are totally different.
:hehe:
March 17, 2010 at 8:17 am
Hi Tarvin,
Thanks for the info.
Will get back if i come across any doubts on this.
Thanks again !!
March 17, 2010 at 8:00 am
can you please elaborate on what exactly you are trying to do?
March 17, 2010 at 7:43 am
Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 170 total)