Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 170 total)
hi Barkingdog,
just curiosity- r u generting these number for test data or some kind of data masking.
March 27, 2010 at 4:03 pm
-- my opinion
it has nothng to do with statistics or restating the server.. its transaction handling issue. logic not written correctly
March 27, 2010 at 3:59 pm
very interesting.. Here is the challenge to find out what changes could have been done at application side.. definitely its not related to SQL Server settings.
March 27, 2010 at 3:53 pm
this has been improved in 2008. Seek happens at partition level and not at total table level.[Partition-Aware Seek Operation]
March 27, 2010 at 1:33 pm
why are trying to restore database when log restore is in progress
March 27, 2010 at 1:26 pm
you can not back up two databases in a single file.
Are you trying to do this?
March 27, 2010 at 1:17 pm
there is not rowid equivalent in SQL Server
March 27, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Please check the the login still exists in the database as a user.
March 27, 2010 at 1:11 pm
same again.
Log shipping happens at whole database level.. no option to select objects.
Transaction replication facilitates you to select objects and filter the data.
March 27, 2010 at 1:02 pm
Though there are lots of differences; Major difference is -
Mirroing happens on whole database
In Replication you have option of selecting objects and filtering of data in the publication.
March 27, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Definitely multiple devices will increase the threads and will do the parallelisim while backing up and restore even if it is on single drive. But if there is bottleneck with...
March 27, 2010 at 12:39 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 170 total)