Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 86 total)
Mauricio, what version of SSRS are you using that's giving you so many headaches?
Vik
March 23, 2006 at 7:30 am
Thanks for the input, Michael.
I realize that rolling our own solution would require reinventing the wheel regarding scheduling, automating report generation, etc. But given our previous experience with the sheer,...
March 22, 2006 at 10:03 am
Troy,
This is a common problem in Canada, which has a blanket 7% GST rate in every province for most products. Most of the implementations I've seen do not track a...
March 10, 2006 at 7:35 am
Dunno if anyone's mentioned Jurassic Park -- they're all trapped in the compound at the end of the movie and can't get the computers working, whereupon the 12 year old...
December 6, 2005 at 2:39 pm
And you're safer in doing so... if you get into the habit of using EM for queries, you may end up doing it on a production server, which may have...
July 22, 2005 at 11:05 am
Hi covhilomi,
I haven't gone thorugh this exercise myself, but would you not have to also worry about collation settings for the databases? Or perhaps not because the European databases were...
July 7, 2005 at 8:10 am
Remi,
I had checked the execution plan for the view and nothing leapt out at me in terms of resources for the sort, so didn't pursue it further.
In any case, I...
March 29, 2005 at 3:03 pm
Ron,
We've used ORDER BY in views for a while, but never really saw any noticeable problems or performance issues. The other fellows' responses indicated that ORDER BY was bad news...
March 29, 2005 at 2:35 pm
PW, thanks for the explanation, that makes sense.
Noel, thanks for your help in pointing out that I should RTFM. Yeah, I saw that further info about optimizations.
Remi, thanks for.... barking...
March 29, 2005 at 2:29 pm
noeld,
A DYNAMIC cursor? OK.. I thought that FAST_FORWARD was equivalent to FORWARD_ONLY READ_ONLY, but I just noticed that the description for FORWARD_ONLY states that unless STATIC, KEYSET, or DYNAMIC is...
March 29, 2005 at 2:06 pm
PW,
1. Removing the ORDER BY clause magically made everything work again.
2. We had just recently done a similar test, different database, same situation, same cursor type, approx'ly 80k records processed...
March 29, 2005 at 1:35 pm
Remi,
Of course, there are many ways around this process. Don't be so quick to judge my situation, however.
The decision to fetch so many rows within a sproc was made in...
March 29, 2005 at 1:29 pm
noeld,
The sproc never gets past the first fetch. Here's the declaration:
Declare CreateTicketsCursor Cursor Local Forward_Only Read_Only For Select CustomerId, BranchesId, CustInvoiceGroupId, CustTicketGroupId, CalculationType, ChainId, MonthEnd, CustomerServiceId, InvoiceAmount, ServiceAmount, RenewalAmount,...
March 29, 2005 at 1:09 pm
Antares,
All good points. Yeah, this pdf is pure propaganda -- old pricing, all kinds of nonsense about zero administration, boasts about functionality that is basic to pretty much any DBMS...
February 11, 2005 at 9:15 am
We've used the "Locks" table method to great success over the past few years, albeit in relatively small (~10 GB) databases with user populations in the dozens. Our application code...
December 31, 2004 at 10:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 86 total)