Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
No, no memory pressures at all.
I've requested a dbcc memorystatus (and the @@version, just to be sure)
January 5, 2012 at 3:23 pm
Yes, 64-bit, sorry.
I realize the OS needs some memory and that the MAX memory should be set.
I still don't see what is keeping SQL from going over 4GB - just...
January 5, 2012 at 1:59 pm
That did it!!! Thank you so much!
😀
December 20, 2011 at 2:14 pm
With the scenario I have, I'm still getting an extra unwanted row.
-------------------------------------
drop table main
create table main(
col1 char(10),
col2 varchar(100))
INSERT INTO main VALUES('101','shshsfhgs')
INSERT INTO main VALUES('102','ertqehwrgs')
INSERT INTO main VALUES('0102','witpipqcqp')
INSERT INTO main VALUES('0103','retrtyhwqpp')
drop...
December 20, 2011 at 1:44 pm
Thanks! I'm getting closer, but not sure if i'm there yet.
Here's a good example of what I'm dealing with:
-------------------------------------------------
drop table main
create table main(
col1 char(10),
col2 varchar(100))
INSERT INTO main VALUES('101','shshsfhgs')
INSERT INTO...
December 20, 2011 at 1:14 pm
Here's a great link: http://www.sqlsecurity.com/FAQs/SQLServerVersionDatabase/tabid/63/Default.aspx
November 22, 2010 at 1:38 pm
I know there may not be any set rules for SQL Server choosing which process to kill in a deadlock situation, but I have seen this behavior from SQL Server...
June 30, 2010 at 8:05 am
It's possible that the job is locking up with another process. As an interactive job (when you manually run it), it would take priority. But as a scheduled...
June 29, 2010 at 12:46 pm
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)