Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 141 total)
Thanks Jason
I had made that change.
From now on I will use MERGE to replace Triggers for audit - all in one place.
October 2, 2012 at 12:23 pm
Thank you. Your example is easier to read.
BTW I was restricting to only chnage rows by comparing the checksum values.
I didn't know you could add additional filters after is matched...
October 2, 2012 at 6:47 am
GilaMonster (9/27/2012)
CloseThe non-leaf levels have just the key columns, leaf levels have all the columns in the table.
Thats a clustered index you describe?
September 27, 2012 at 9:47 am
You're right.. I've muddied the waters somewhat..
I guess though he like me works in a place where the Network Support Team would ask me to do it.
September 27, 2012 at 9:41 am
Thanks
I have a nonclustered index on this table with 2 fields numeric(8,0) + numeric(10,0)
5 + 9 + 12 (datetime clustered index) = 26 bytes
I Changed clustered index fields...
September 27, 2012 at 9:33 am
Your point in separating the code from the data is a very good one (accde I think you called it). I also luckly had no code in Access my code...
September 27, 2012 at 8:47 am
Hi
I've linked Access to SQL Server via ODBC, it links to updatable views that a few selected users can use for read/write. The rest link to SQL via Access so...
September 26, 2012 at 2:53 am
SELECT * FROM [AD_in_Out LOG] as tLog
INNER JOIN
(SELECT USERID, MAX(CHECKTIME) as LastTime
GROUP BY [userid]) as tREs
ON tLog.Userid = tRes.Userid
AND tLog.CHECKTIME = tREs.LastTime
September 25, 2012 at 3:38 pm
2 datatypes, one can store more digits in less bytes than the other, I must of missed something obvious here..
I'm asking as I wanted to use decimal (9,3) for prices,...
September 25, 2012 at 9:20 am
Although a friend has managed to install in no problems I continue to have this problem.
This product is not supported on Win7.
To get around this I've installed it in XP...
August 16, 2012 at 2:40 am
Jeff I'll pass on your reagrds to them.
I think the National lottery computer uses the same functionality many into one 😉
I've learnt quite abit form this forum, long may it...
March 22, 2012 at 2:55 am
A badly written join will produce more results normally than expected, a cartesian product it behaves correctly. Set based stuff thats what SQL is about.
This is a bug, that could...
March 14, 2012 at 4:24 pm
Thanks Gila
I tried the update and it did work. I'm certain I have had to change queries before to do
set tbl1.field1 = MAX(tbl2.field1)
I'm more confused now..
March 14, 2012 at 8:06 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 141 total)