Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Here I was believing in Kimball! To prove or disprove my guru's theory I went and looked at a client database that has been in operation for about a year....
April 19, 2010 at 2:11 am
Quoting "The Microsoft Data Warehouse Toolkit" by Ross and Kimball pg 245: "...This is a common technique for high performance dimension change management. Compute the hashes and store them in...
April 16, 2010 at 1:48 am
If you're planning to compare all of the columns anyway then you don't need to generate a hash code.
I dont agree with this. An index is only useful for retrieving...
April 15, 2010 at 1:29 am
Wrapping hashbytes with checksum is not bad as long as you include all columns in your join as indicated and create the index including all columns required for the join....
April 14, 2010 at 7:17 am
In reply to : fnHashCalc(field1, Field2) AS Meta_Hash
Its not the most elegant solution but checksum(fnHash(field1), fnHash(field2)) as Meta_hash will do what you looking for...
April 14, 2010 at 6:57 am
Hi
Iv'e been developing a DWH for about three years and starting using this technique about a year ago. I started off by trying a checksum but that was way off...
April 14, 2010 at 6:26 am
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)