Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
that's really great. thank you a lot! it worked fine.
January 11, 2009 at 5:58 am
Could a MOD shift this into SQL2005 topic? sorry for that
January 5, 2009 at 7:31 am
sheh, mistrusting. ey...
I'll post it when I've got some time. Will use a tally table to crawl through the records
September 25, 2007 at 4:59 am
bah... it depends on the bureaucracy in the enterprise.... Never heard of IT Governance and Standard utilities ? :w00t:
However, do you have a cool trick to relabel the diffrent entries...
September 25, 2007 at 1:39 am
Jeff, wise guy - tell that the vendor! How easy our lives would be when people would think, ain't it?
Could imagine that I can improve performance in re-labeling this...
September 22, 2007 at 1:33 am
did have a thought on ranking, but as the table is being provided AS IS (why do people always report on 3rd party products databases ....) I must accept the performance...
September 21, 2007 at 11:46 am
how to do it then? its basically the same point of start but I have more values per ID
September 21, 2007 at 10:48 am
pity - yeah understand. but the problem of transforming rows to columns would exist in either way... why can't people just do normalized tables
September 21, 2007 at 10:45 am
no ideas here? or am I just to stupid, I would appreciate this answer as well
September 21, 2007 at 9:58 am
Playing the devils advocate... Jeff Modens SQL is absolutely a Must to know... There was - however - the comment that the MIN does not work when having more answers...
September 13, 2007 at 4:45 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)