Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 528 total)
A reference for those interested in FORFILES command:
January 8, 2008 at 8:50 am
Naivete to the side, here's an old saw:
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over.
January 8, 2008 at 8:45 am
Well, that was the brute force solution...
January 7, 2008 at 2:30 pm
What kind of connection? Towards what end? Are you shipping data in either direction? replicating? trying to execute a multi-server query? Pls give us some...
January 3, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Jon (12/31/2007)
- db_datareader
- db_datawriter
- db_ddladmin
- public - it was already checked and...
January 3, 2008 at 10:26 am
For what it's worth, I also experienced severe challenges trying to get Named Pipes to work, following the 'best' MS advice. In the end, connecting from SS2k5 Standard Edition...
January 3, 2008 at 10:23 am
OK... I'm a newbie returning after a several months absence... here's the scenario: Express Edition (Compact ed?) does not support scheduling regular backups, so the goal is to use...
December 27, 2007 at 12:39 pm
Rejith -
1. Welcome to the forums!
2. IF this is a SQL 2000 problem, you may have more luck with responses in the SQL 2000 administration forum, rather than...
September 12, 2007 at 8:13 am
How frequently are statistics updated? Have you forced a recompile of the procedure since early May (date of last documented change in this fragment - which year was it...
August 23, 2007 at 12:29 pm
Along the lines of your 'rant' portion: IF this is an adhoc query, and IF you want to pay your client for the amount of time and effort they...
August 23, 2007 at 12:14 pm
And we wish you would have pointed exactly which aspect of SQL Server you wanted to focus on first.
There are no quick fixes. SS2k5 is an involved, complicated software...
August 23, 2007 at 12:08 pm
da - when you catch up to this thread this evening, some suggestions - to make your notational use clear, and hopefully allow us to respond to you more accurately...
August 23, 2007 at 11:51 am
This is where they will tweak their numbers and then want to overlay what they've done with the latest and greatest? or will they want to keep their various...
August 23, 2007 at 9:18 am
Are you saying that the vendor is insisting that you maintain compatibility 80 so their software will work? All that means is that you are unable to take advantage...
August 23, 2007 at 8:22 am
try executing the following and report back please.
select * from msdb.dbo.sysjobs_view
August 23, 2007 at 7:43 am
Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 528 total)