Viewing 11 posts - 571 through 581 (of 581 total)
Is the 'where' clause generally going to be an equality join on a particular column? If so you could have a table into which you write the search value for...
June 19, 2003 at 10:48 am
If you want a trouble-free way of dropping tables....
This sp drops all column constraints and defaults on a field, then drops the field.
The code is a bit messy (exec during...
June 19, 2003 at 9:39 am
jpipes - I understand the issue - I just disagreed about what was being asked for.
June 19, 2003 at 7:55 am
If you restrict the SQL username to 'dbo' that will exclude any other users - where the username is actually populated. But if SQl user is null it gets included...
June 19, 2003 at 7:51 am
I don't think so mate - you jumped to a conclusion based on Drewid's FAILED attempt to join the queries together. I think D's utterly pellucid clarification in response should...
June 19, 2003 at 7:38 am
You need to use a CASE statment instead of WHERE clause to restrict the values going into the aggregate. The code below assumes that you can't have negative values in...
June 19, 2003 at 3:40 am
You need to use a CASE statment instead of WHERE clause to restrict the values going into the aggregate. The code below assumes that you can't have negative values in...
June 19, 2003 at 3:40 am
You need to use a CASE statment instead of WHERE clause to restrict the values going into the aggregate. The code below assumes that you can't have negative values in...
June 19, 2003 at 3:40 am
The covering index (all fields required are in the index) will be helping performance compared to a table scan, especially if the table is wide. This is because the query...
June 19, 2003 at 3:25 am
Viewing 11 posts - 571 through 581 (of 581 total)