Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 479 total)

  • RE: The Optimists

    The usual problem is trying to follow part 1 of rule #2 (follow users' orders) while only bending rule #1 (i.e. a slight performance impact) when you'd really like to...

  • RE: T-SQL Query

    I would never rely on a trick based on a particular feature of the data which wasn't relevant to the selection. In my opinion, this is extremely bad practice.

    As written,...

  • RE: Linking to next row using a join on row_number()+1=row_number()

    Peso (2)

    create table #t (id int not null, st char(1) not null, date datetime not null, seq int null)

    --

    --.... main fill omitted

    --

    DECLARE@Seq INT,

    @Yak INT,

    @st CHAR(1)

    SET@Seq = -1

    UPDATE#t

    SET@Seq = @Seq +...

  • RE: Linking to next row using a join on row_number()+1=row_number()

    Both Jeff's and Peso's queries do not eliminate pairs where the status stays the same. Additionally, as Peso pointed out, Jeff didn't remove the 'pairs' where the ids don't match....

  • RE: Linking to next row using a join on row_number()+1=row_number()

    Hi Gsquared,

    Thanks for the hint.

    I tried implementing your use of dense_rank instead of row_number and located an omission in my code. In my version 2, CTE t4 should have group...

  • RE: Linking to next row using a join on row_number()+1=row_number()

    GSquared (4/11/2008)


    I used your temp table and test data on 9000 rows, 1000 IDs in #t.

    Here's the query I wrote, based on the description you gave in the original post:

    ;with...

  • RE: Linking to next row using a join on row_number()+1=row_number()

    Glen (4/11/2008)


    Can you please add the parameters and settings on your tempdb? Could it be linked to the fact that you are simply hitting an "auto grow" of your...

  • RE: Linking to next row using a join on row_number()+1=row_number()

    GSquared (4/11/2008)


    I could probably help, if you provide the table structure, including indexes, some sample data, and the query you're using.

    Did you read the script? I thought I put everything...

  • RE: Upgrading SQL Server 2005

    I got this right and have, in the past, upgraded a trial Exchange Server to full version, so I know it works for some MS software and assumed it would...

  • RE: No XP, but Look Forward To 7

    Matt Miller (4/9/2008)


    Consistency is cute, but the optimizer needs to be able to keep up and know what the right way to handle that variable. Jeff stumbled onto one...

  • RE: No XP, but Look Forward To 7

    GSquared (4/8/2008)


    On the consistency point, I have enough problems with T-SQL having weird consistency issues already. My (least) favorite example is Replace vs Charindex. One has the parent...

  • RE: SQL Server 2005 SP3

    Ziljan4 (4/6/2008)


    Micorsoft SQL Server 2005 SP3 will be available pretty soon.

    Is this just wishful thinking or do you know something?

  • RE: Largest Unit

    srienstr (4/4/2008)


    Derek Dongray (4/4/2008)


    No, there is only one type of person in the world: those who count.

    Except of course for Democrat primary voters in MI and FL. :hehe:

    The joke was...

  • RE: No XP, but Look Forward To 7

    I haven't used Vista yet, except for a brief trial, but am quite happy with XP, so won't be changing soon.

    On the matter of Consistency. Since Microsoft control the specification...

  • RE: Largest Unit

    srienstr (4/4/2008)


    Shaun McGuile (4/4/2008)


    Aleksandr Furman:

    How is that funny?

    Is that not the truth? 😉

    Like the one told to me by an accountant;

    "There are three types of accountant in this world,...

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 479 total)