Viewing 14 posts - 46 through 59 (of 59 total)
For the difference between EXECUTE AS options, please consult:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181362.aspx
and as for stored procedure permissions, please consult books online or MSDN. Just creating a proc doesn't mean that users have permissions...
October 23, 2013 at 8:30 am
OK, are you sure it's not a client-side issue ?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948615
also, see this MSDN piece:
October 23, 2013 at 8:26 am
You need to confirm that you do indeed have the same permissions on the database. Authentication is a bit weird, but if you both get the same results from this...
October 23, 2013 at 7:43 am
..or, if this happens a lot, and it's on SQL2008 and above, you could use Policy Based Management. 🙂
Easier solution would be to use Powershell.
October 23, 2013 at 7:32 am
I'm not sure you can use BCP to export directly to XLSX, and I'm not even sure you can use it to export driectly to XLS. You can export to...
October 23, 2013 at 7:23 am
Bhuvnesh (9/24/2013)
Perry Whittle (9/19/2013)
Using the @affinity and @throttle parameters you are able to specify which processors the backup uses and the max CPU %
Can we take help of...
September 26, 2013 at 6:43 am
Certainly, partitioning is one case for multiple file groups (although I have seen sliding windows partitions on the PRIMARY filegroup). If you partition-align your indexes as well, that's a win...
March 25, 2013 at 7:27 am
From memory, the 20 character limit is usually when you're running a Hybrid (NT4 and Post Win2K) Active Directory. I've not come across anyone using an AD infrastructure (ie Windows...
May 2, 2012 at 5:24 am
So, the key bit here is that SQL will *decide* whether the sequence is ascending or descending based on the INCREMENT BY argument. That's a bit misleading if your just...
April 24, 2012 at 4:20 am
Agree with those who say the question is a bit confusing.
If you have containment set to NONE, then it's not a contained database, surely ? Especially since all new databases...
March 29, 2012 at 4:40 am
You're right, and for the reasons in my blog post 🙂
My bad. Sorry, I'll get my coat.
March 9, 2012 at 4:32 am
Even if you hadn't added the constraint to the table, the second program would still fail because there would already be the temp table from the first program.
I wrote a...
March 9, 2012 at 3:59 am
Possibly because INSTANCE01 is on the port that would normally be used for a default instance.
Maybe when you make a request to a default instance (i.e. no instance name), a...
March 8, 2012 at 4:33 am
You could try using an expression on the connection string for your destination that constructs the file name from variables that are incremented each time you SELECT your TOP 99.
March 8, 2012 at 4:23 am
Viewing 14 posts - 46 through 59 (of 59 total)