Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 782 total)
@cirquedeSQL
When I ran that script, out of 300 orphaned users around 250 got syncronized.
I came to know about the 50 by running the--
exec sp_change_users_login 'REPORT'
When I tried to syncronize those...
July 28, 2010 at 8:47 am
India --> chicago
chicago --> British virgin islands
British virgin islands--> ??
July 28, 2010 at 8:02 am
@cirqued
Did you restore this database to a different server?
There are scripts here at SSC and on the web that will help you fix all users at once.
Here is one such...
July 27, 2010 at 3:03 pm
I think that did the trick...
but when I executed
Exec sp_change_users_login 'REPORT'
to see which all other users became orphan, there were 300 more...:(
so.. Is there a way...
July 27, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Does this only happen for one specific user?
This appears to be happening in an application. Have you verified the connection string to be correct?
What is the default database for the...
July 27, 2010 at 12:59 pm
yes, these things happen sometimes, i guess bug in sql2k5 maintenance plans..
July 27, 2010 at 7:13 am
@ cirqued
The logins disabled are the users...For ex bre,gra,jon etc..
July 26, 2010 at 1:20 pm
I asked, nobody did it..
Now can i enable all at 1 script or each one of them differently from GUI.
July 26, 2010 at 11:59 am
Which logins were disabled? Ones that you created?
Are you creating these via script or through the gui?
The server level logins...I didnt create them.
They were made when the server was...
July 26, 2010 at 11:14 am
@ lowell
got it....
thanks a lot
Sushant
Virgin Islands
July 22, 2010 at 10:02 am
@ lowell
So the synonyms A,B and C which i created will be local to database level or server level..?
and how to deallocate those synonyms once the use is over?
thanks
Sushant
Virgin Islands
July 22, 2010 at 9:16 am
no im not logging into xyz server..
im using it as a linked server as my query takes output from 2 servers..
is there a way?
July 22, 2010 at 6:31 am
@sumanth
wat version of sql server are you using..
backward compatiblity in restoring a databse is not there
make sure.
Sushant
July 21, 2010 at 3:12 pm
@ sushant
It's not considered good practice to shrink a production database.
If the database has been shrunk and new data is added then it has to grow again, probably at...
July 21, 2010 at 7:09 am
Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 782 total)