Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 104 total)
Well actually yes, Foxpro is faster than SQL in many cases. This was originally due to the Rushmore technology that Fox Software developed, which was subsequently adopted by Microsoft...
August 5, 2002 at 5:04 pm
Is your database automatically extending? Change the incrementation value to something much bigger, say 250Mb. This will reduce physical fragmentation.
As Steve says, this could be caused by a...
July 31, 2002 at 5:54 pm
Simple:
CREATE PROCEDURE foo WITH ENCRYPTION
If you own the source code, then ask for it, otherwise, you're stuck.
Simon, UK
July 31, 2002 at 7:30 am
I have done a similar thing migrating Foxpro to t-SQL.
I assume you mean:
declare @Foo int
set @Foo=4
select case when @Foo>3 then 'more than 3' else...
July 29, 2002 at 5:30 am
The network is relevant because that is what you have. Each of those SAN devices is connected via a FC switch to your server(s). The speed of most...
July 29, 2002 at 4:08 am
You could also construct your query string in a separate variable, then just pass that to @query.
July 17, 2002 at 8:44 am
You ought to be talking to Microsoft directly about this. As you know, there are very few hardware vendors that can ship Datacenter Server. NEC comes to mind,...
July 11, 2002 at 9:01 am
You could put the table in its own database and set the Recovery option to Simple (in 2000); or set Truncate Log on Checkpoint (in 7 or earlier).
So long as...
July 9, 2002 at 3:41 am
Yes, Brian when are we going to see your review? Downloading the demo is not trivial, so your review is eagerly awaited.
Regards
Simon
June 25, 2002 at 10:49 am
Well I'll suggest that you're deleting rows from base.dbo.na_log which has an alias of B in the following query, but you're filtering on A.Update_Type?
Perhaps it's more subtle than this?
Regards
Simon
June 19, 2002 at 8:21 am
Hi Vijay
Could I ask a few questions on this:
Are you calling a stored procedure to extract your result set?, or is it a dynamic query? Are there parameters on...
June 19, 2002 at 3:37 am
As a thought, if you have an overnight process that needs one specific index to improve it, why not create the index within that stored procedure, or before it, then...
June 13, 2002 at 10:06 am
I think there is a contradiction here. On the one hand, you are saying OLTP, and then you're saying heavily indexed big tables. What do you mean by...
June 13, 2002 at 9:11 am
Have you altered any of the parameters in the SQL setup regarding dynamic allocations of memory? Can you tell us the CPU in the machine? Have you actually...
June 13, 2002 at 7:20 am
Apologies if this sounds flippant, but you're trying to run a memory hungry database server on a machine which is totally inadequate. I know from past experience of running...
June 13, 2002 at 4:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 104 total)