Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 72 total)
Though it appears to be a warning while table creation, update & Inserts will fail with error
Cannot create a row of size xxxx which is greater than the allowable maximum...
June 19, 2007 at 6:56 am
This would be error message you will get if you start a transaction in any other level and then changes isolation level to snpshot; at statement level with table hint...
June 14, 2007 at 3:59 am
hey mike
What is problem with soln suggested by Darryl?
declare
@option int
set
@option = 1
SELECT
*
June 13, 2007 at 9:28 am
Hi Michal
I don't think its possible to define snapshot isolation as table hint, it is feature enabled/disabled at database level. Can you please tell us why do u want this table...
June 13, 2007 at 8:37 am
SQL Server supports Float data type values ranging from -1.79E + 308 through 1.79E + 308 & Real allows Floating precision number data from 3.40E + 38 through 3.40E + 38....
June 11, 2007 at 4:30 am
Hi John
Heard of Row versioning in SQL 2005? Snapshot isolation does provide it. The following document would give you an idea of how to handle snapshot isolation in sql 2005....
June 7, 2007 at 5:05 am
The document prefers to have temp table created first and then push data using Insert into Select query. I would prefer it to have Select into..from quety for creating...
June 6, 2007 at 9:19 am
Hi AndyDev
Though your code is looking nice by splitting tasks in two sps, It could become a bottleneck if you use Insert..Exec to get results of both sps...
June 6, 2007 at 3:31 am
can you please paste execution plan of both queries?
May 29, 2007 at 5:07 am
JMeyer32,
You must be getting errors with severity 20-25, as they terminates the database connection CATCH block could not handle them.
May 7, 2007 at 7:14 am
Hi Jules
SQL BOL: Returns the number of characters, rather than the number of bytes, of the given string expression, excluding trailing blanks.
In your exmaple space appeared to be last character...
May 1, 2007 at 7:09 am
if you are using SQL 2005 better you use ALTER INDEX than DBCC DBREINDEX as it would be removed from future version, more over ALTER INDEX does provide online index...
April 27, 2007 at 9:36 am
SQL server marks each log record with Log Sequence Number.Every modification to database is logged, it can be anything like creating, committing, rollbacking transactions or backup, restore, or allocating pages...
April 27, 2007 at 5:57 am
I guess, it must be related to Lock Escalation Threshold. Lock escalation threshold is 5000 locks for single reference of table or index by single T-SQL statement or when the number...
April 26, 2007 at 6:41 am
use DBCC TraceFalgs 1211,1224 for disabling lock escalations to higher levels. For more information http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/05/17/Lock-escalation.aspx
Feature is not there in SQL 2000.
April 3, 2007 at 1:04 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 72 total)