Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 183 total)
Not to create more confusion, but what is the business need here? If you only want to return one row of data per account number, then why return the address...
January 13, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Oh cool thanks 🙂
Your post most have come right as I was posting mine 😀
January 11, 2010 at 12:03 pm
Right, but if I develop a cube using the evaluation edition on the server, when the time expires will I not be able to use the cubes that I designed...
January 11, 2010 at 11:54 am
I have a few full evaluation editions from the Microsoft books that include the 180 day trial and include everything. I know this because I am using one of the...
January 11, 2010 at 11:37 am
I figured out the problem.
None of my @sql = '' included the N'' in any statement. I converted every assignment to this and it works like a...
January 8, 2010 at 2:44 pm
Jeff Moden (1/7/2010)
Only if it's a constant... in 2k5, it'll take any variable datatype that's implicitly convertable to NText and that includes VARCHAR.
Jeff can you show an example of this?
January 7, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Piotr.Rodak (1/7/2010)
January 7, 2010 at 11:16 am
Thank you for all the responses, I will try out a few of the suggestions here! However, I did find a solution though I have no idea why it works...
January 7, 2010 at 10:14 am
That is strange I am only returning some 6k+ characters and I still get a truncated (though very close to the end now) sql statement.
Is it possible because I...
January 6, 2010 at 6:32 pm
Ok I do have the code fixed now but I am still running into the problem towards the end of my code. I pasted into word and it says there...
January 6, 2010 at 3:21 pm
I think I finally figured the problem out!
For some stupid reason I had @sql = @sql + @sql + @Variable in 8 places! (waaaaay...
January 6, 2010 at 2:50 pm
Varchar(max) isn't acceptable because it has to be nVarchar(Max). But that still has a character limit I have surpassed.
Is there not another way to get around that?
January 6, 2010 at 12:37 pm
Thank you however, this completely changes the use of having parameterized dynamic SQL...
Surely there is a solution that doesn't involve rearranging the usage of sp_executesql
December 30, 2009 at 3:14 pm
It's not him anymore that is the problem it is ME...the administrator to the entire server...
I was able to resolve his issue after some research but it was after I...
December 29, 2009 at 5:22 pm
No ideas on this at all?!
Wow I like blowing stuff up so well that even the experts are silent 🙂
December 29, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 183 total)