Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 313 total)
At my company, we have implemented this cumulative update for a number of recently built instances, standalone and clustered, and there haven't been any reports of issues from any of...
January 23, 2011 at 6:34 pm
From what I've read, you should be able to move both instances over to node A, successfully run the upgrade on the passive node, now node B, and then fail...
January 23, 2011 at 6:29 pm
I believe Perry is steering you in the way of choosing to add a new instance, don't "add features" to the existing installation.
The way we handle "clustered" SSRS is the...
January 23, 2011 at 6:23 pm
Gaius,
In a Windows cluster, the disk will only be available where the disk is currently active. Since the disks are part of the SQL Server application within the cluster,...
January 23, 2011 at 6:11 pm
As you mention, the SAN companies have combated the the issue with larger caches, and to my knowledge, my company solely uses RAID 5 in all SAN arrays. We...
January 9, 2011 at 2:43 pm
You could do that, but then you'd have a one-node failover cluster installed. And, the storage on the back-end would still be seen by the evicted node. So,...
December 8, 2010 at 9:18 am
What service account are you using for the publication? Since you can get it working on DB1 on server1, it sounds like the service account might be set to...
December 7, 2010 at 10:19 pm
Somewhat old for an urgent issue, but did you actually try to telnet port 5022 on both the primary and secondary servers to make sure they can communicate with each...
December 7, 2010 at 10:14 pm
Gail and Pradeep are correct.
For your situation, you'd likely want to look toward replication, and you can exclude deletes within the configuration of the publication. It's more involved to...
December 7, 2010 at 10:08 pm
Do you have the failover partner specified in the application connection string? What source is bring provided for where the login is failing?
Is the application reporting a login failure...
December 7, 2010 at 10:03 pm
Found another post discussing this.. doesn't seem to have a solid answer there either.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic982141-391-1.aspx
One recommendation I saw there was to remove the endpoint from the witness, and then...
December 7, 2010 at 9:57 pm
I would think you should be able to pick a brief maintenance window, take your application offline, point your application connections over to the secondary instance (the log shipped instance),...
December 7, 2010 at 9:50 pm
I'm curious to know what solutions people provide for this as well. We are getting more into replication, and trying to use P2P so we can go with active-active...
December 7, 2010 at 9:33 pm
I'm not an SSAS guru by any means, but I believe it'd be handled similar to how you'd do that with the Database Engine.
You'll likely need to install new instances...
December 7, 2010 at 9:02 pm
I echo what Ed stated. Not entirely sure how a CTP made it's way into production. We generally don't even touch the new product releases until a few...
December 6, 2010 at 10:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 313 total)