Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 223 total)
Mighty (9/15/2016)
+1Reading this question, it seems logical to assume that there is a record with id 2.
And also assume that it's original value for the HireDate falls within the CHECK...
September 15, 2016 at 1:51 am
Magnus Ahlkvist (9/15/2016)
When I try to update a view (defined using WITH CHECK OPTION) with a value which makes the row fall outside...
September 15, 2016 at 1:34 am
In addition to the previous, the padding has changed on SQL 2016. It will pad with 0000, 3333 or 6667, depending on the value of the DATETIME. I suppose that...
August 26, 2016 at 12:29 am
And once again, Steve's proof-reading skills prove somewhat lackadaisical 😛
August 23, 2016 at 12:01 am
Wouldn't this depend on whether the limit is set with MAX_CPU_PERCENT or CAP_CPU_PERCENT?
May 12, 2016 at 2:56 am
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (4/15/2016)
Rune Bivrin (4/15/2016)
Is it only me who thinks Steve's error quota for QotD has risen...
April 15, 2016 at 2:51 am
Ah, well. Got to read a bit about log shipping. That's worth something.
Is it only me who thinks Steve's error quota for QotD has risen considerably as of late?:hehe:
April 15, 2016 at 2:42 am
patricklambin (4/7/2016)
April 8, 2016 at 12:14 am
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (3/31/2016)
March 31, 2016 at 5:35 am
Toreador (2/17/2016)
Incredible that at the time of writing, only 75% got this right!
Yeah, well I read it a bit too quickly, and couldn't quite accept the idea of a nullable...
February 18, 2016 at 7:25 am
It's somewhat interesting that the topic cited for reference disagrees a great deal with this:
Aah! Now I see it. Not specified when executing the SP, but when creating...
February 1, 2016 at 6:38 am
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 223 total)