Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
Keith,
Just adding my two cents to the information you have provided:
It is recommended that bitmaps are best suited when the cardinality of the column is low.
For example : ...
November 26, 2003 at 8:49 am
Gary,
Just curious, what is the purpose of your query?
I think, unless you use an 'order by clause', the rows selected will be sorted by the first column of each...
November 17, 2003 at 7:40 am
Can your job process empty input files without giving errors?
If so, here is an idea. :
If the users can send you an empty file on the days of special...
October 31, 2003 at 10:57 am
Wanda,
Sorry about the death in your family.
It not clear what exactly do you want out of your SQL.
If you did not understand dj_meier's post, here is another example:
List all the...
June 23, 2003 at 2:32 pm
Hi planet115,
Thanks for your detailed posts. I have no contest to the argument that integer math is faster than fractional math.
As long as you use stored procedures while retrieving and...
June 19, 2003 at 10:24 am
planet115,
Basically, you were suggesting to use a kind of encryption. (eg 1=1, 11=11, 100=12, 200=24 etc).
If you use encryption while storing the data, you should use decription while reading it....
June 19, 2003 at 7:52 am
Hi planet115,
"Or you could store it as an int with an implicit decimal point -
eg 1=1, 11=11, 100=12, 200=24 etc."
I think, storing it as integer in such manner might not...
June 16, 2003 at 8:32 am
Here is my two cents:
Whenever a system receives data from External sources, it is prudent to do a validation (sanity check) on the data before loading it to your production...
June 11, 2003 at 7:26 am
Wanda,
I repeat : Give us an example of the table contents and the result set.
Your example should contain both - ' Table Contents" and 'Expected result-set'. It won't be hard....
June 9, 2003 at 12:54 pm
Wanda,
Perhaps, you can reduce the ambiguity by giving an example of the table contents and the result set you are expecting.
Ram
June 9, 2003 at 11:53 am
maffan76,
You can remove the 'time part' from the date without causing any PK contraint violations.
You have to re-consider the primary key of the fact table.
What is the current primary-key of...
June 9, 2003 at 11:35 am
DAVNovak,
Thanks for explaining it in more words.
To add a bit of humor:
In other words, the SQL logic is inverted by 180 degrees from the normal English query.
(If Wanda requires AND,...
June 9, 2003 at 10:53 am
Wanda,
I think you have been using an incorrect SQL.
Use OR instead of AND in your SQL and try again.
(LEDef_ActiveInd = 1 OR LEDef_Cd Like '10-%)
Ram
June 9, 2003 at 9:47 am
Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy