Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
Keith,
Just adding my two cents to the information you have provided:
It is recommended that bitmaps are best suited when the cardinality of the column is low.
For example : ...
November 26, 2003 at 8:49 am
Gary,
Just curious, what is the purpose of your query?
I think, unless you use an 'order by clause', the rows selected will be sorted by the first column of each...
November 17, 2003 at 7:40 am
Can your job process empty input files without giving errors?
If so, here is an idea. :
If the users can send you an empty file on the days of special...
October 31, 2003 at 10:57 am
Wanda,
Sorry about the death in your family.
It not clear what exactly do you want out of your SQL.
If you did not understand dj_meier's post, here is another example:
List all the...
June 23, 2003 at 2:32 pm
Hi planet115,
Thanks for your detailed posts. I have no contest to the argument that integer math is faster than fractional math.
As long as you use stored procedures while retrieving and...
June 19, 2003 at 10:24 am
planet115,
Basically, you were suggesting to use a kind of encryption. (eg 1=1, 11=11, 100=12, 200=24 etc).
If you use encryption while storing the data, you should use decription while reading it....
June 19, 2003 at 7:52 am
Hi planet115,
"Or you could store it as an int with an implicit decimal point -
eg 1=1, 11=11, 100=12, 200=24 etc."
I think, storing it as integer in such manner might not...
June 16, 2003 at 8:32 am
Here is my two cents:
Whenever a system receives data from External sources, it is prudent to do a validation (sanity check) on the data before loading it to your production...
June 11, 2003 at 7:26 am
Wanda,
I repeat : Give us an example of the table contents and the result set.
Your example should contain both - ' Table Contents" and 'Expected result-set'. It won't be hard....
June 9, 2003 at 12:54 pm
Wanda,
Perhaps, you can reduce the ambiguity by giving an example of the table contents and the result set you are expecting.
Ram
June 9, 2003 at 11:53 am
maffan76,
You can remove the 'time part' from the date without causing any PK contraint violations.
You have to re-consider the primary key of the fact table.
What is the current primary-key of...
June 9, 2003 at 11:35 am
DAVNovak,
Thanks for explaining it in more words.
To add a bit of humor:
In other words, the SQL logic is inverted by 180 degrees from the normal English query.
(If Wanda requires AND,...
June 9, 2003 at 10:53 am
Wanda,
I think you have been using an incorrect SQL.
Use OR instead of AND in your SQL and try again.
(LEDef_ActiveInd = 1 OR LEDef_Cd Like '10-%)
Ram
June 9, 2003 at 9:47 am
Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)