Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
It appears that the client is obsessed with charts.
Cramming too much information in one page/one chart will be often counter-productive.
If the intent is to analyze the trend in faults, there...
March 30, 2009 at 8:48 am
Have you tried a column chart instead of the line chart?
A column chart does not need two points - unlike the line chart.
March 25, 2009 at 8:30 pm
I see that TKD-BB's suggestion is a sound one.
But, if you want to go with your way, have you tried adding a parameter to the Summary report?
You can define a...
January 24, 2009 at 7:24 am
Hi,
Here is an alternative to Boolean type.
Use the data type Integer with available values 0 and 1.
Label Value
Open 1
History...
November 23, 2008 at 3:30 pm
What kind of report is this?
Can you create a summary report and sub-reports with fewer rows?
It seems that a report with 10000 rows is very difficult to read and...
November 8, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Just curious. .
In your target, are you storing date in a numeric field?
What was the reasoning behind this decision? Why not store in in a datetime field?
Was it done for...
April 2, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Lenard,
I think, this is not the way relational tables or SQL are intended to be used.
Here is a quote from the article you referred:
"What we want is the first item...
March 28, 2004 at 9:04 am
If you do not care about the values in CADD and CScore, you can use this query:
Select CName, max(CADD),max(CScore) from Customerdetails
group by CName;
Note : You can use any group function -...
March 27, 2004 at 4:50 pm
Irene, You are lucky to have so many helpful members on this forum. But, I am surprised that your course-instructors or materials did... |
January 24, 2004 at 12:11 pm
Hi Tom,
Sorry, I do not have any expertise in SQL server to offer any suggestion.
But I am just curious about the vendor selling this product.
Are you at liberty to mention...
January 16, 2004 at 9:39 pm
KARE4VB,
You mentioned : Quote
By the way, I realize the second example would not return all the records in a one to many relationship, but for the sake of argument assume...
January 2, 2004 at 8:37 am
Hi Stuart (stubob),
I agree with you. Pre-calculation makes sense. This calculation is done only once and it is a time-saver. (If you do not pre-calculate, the same time-consuming calculations and...
December 11, 2003 at 8:13 am
Hi,
Here is an addendum:
In my previous post, I meant storing hours in a separate column with a different data type (float or real or whatever) - not as datetime.
Thanks
RA
December 11, 2003 at 8:04 am
Hi Karl,
I am glad you could solve the problem. Here is some thought:
Perhaps it is not the best way to store the number of hours. You will be better off...
December 11, 2003 at 8:00 am
cfeisel,
Thanks for updating us on your solution.
More often than not, the members ignore to inform the group after they find a solution to their problem. I appreciate your post.
Just thought...
December 7, 2003 at 8:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)