Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 161 total)
I fully understand what you are saying sjcsystems, I to have experienced queries which cause problems on SMP machines and have had to use then OPTION(MAXDOP n) option.
I think that...
December 20, 2002 at 7:41 am
As far as I am aware SQL Server 7.0/2000 are both fully SMP aware.
Having additional processors increases the number of available processor threads which increases the number of concurrent tasks...
December 20, 2002 at 7:25 am
Execute the following and it will tell you which version you have installed.
SELECT @@version
December 19, 2002 at 9:38 am
I think you are just seeking a discussion topic, but just in case you are looking for a solutions.
You could write a trigger to allow only unique non-Null values.
December 19, 2002 at 9:36 am
Tim, have you got an example of that you can post here?
December 19, 2002 at 9:23 am
Are you sure you are not running something like the Personal Edition of SQL Server.
For a production environment you should be running the Enterprise or Standard Edition.
December 19, 2002 at 8:22 am
Have you checked the "Maximum concurrent user connections" setting SQL Server Properties, Connections?
It should normally be set to 0 (zero) - this gives you unlimited connections.
December 19, 2002 at 7:38 am
The most usual way to output data from SQL Server to an Excel file would be to use a DTS Package.
December 19, 2002 at 1:59 am
One solution would be to build a distinct list of Key values in a subquery using a union statement for each column you need to search. Then join this...
December 18, 2002 at 3:40 am
How many of the columns within your table have full text indexes built on them?
December 18, 2002 at 3:28 am
Ok I see your point (I am fully aware of variable scope and the scope of dynamic statements).
Just to give another view point, how about using the temporary table and...
December 18, 2002 at 3:19 am
You could try using a subquery within your dynamic sql, this would eliminate the need to use a temporary table and allow you to use the now recommended TOP method.
DECLARE...
December 18, 2002 at 2:50 am
I agree with Scorpion_66, your code appears to be syntactically correct.
However, in terms of performance, why are you getting the count of rows from the inserted table before performing the...
December 17, 2002 at 10:26 am
SQL BOL (SQL 2000) states the following regarding the SET ROWCOUNT command.
"It is recommended that DELETE, INSERT and UPDATE statements currently using SET ROWCOUNT by rewritten to use the TOP...
December 17, 2002 at 10:15 am
Mkumari, I think you missed the fact that in akhaibari's code, the param @flights_table is actually a TABLE variable.
Therefore SELECT * FROM @flights_table is perfectly valid.
December 17, 2002 at 10:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 161 total)