Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 116 total)
Ok, Jeff, I'll tell you Ever fumbled around with index fill factors? There are times when they have to be adjusted. How should a maintenance plan...
March 1, 2006 at 7:38 am
I'm afraid you missed the goal
or do you think, i'm payed per line of code?
March 1, 2006 at 7:30 am
definition : of course - just overpaced while planning dinner
But with the query, it is still NOT clear, whether inner or outer joins are meant. The...
March 1, 2006 at 7:23 am
I wonder, why people always confuse CURSORS and LOOPS or whether they even know the difference...
One solution:
BEGIN TRAN
DECLARE @OrderID INT,
@OrderAmount FLOAT,
@OrderAmountScheduled FLOAT
WHILE @myAmounttoSchedule > 0
BEGIN
SELECT
@OrderID = OrderID,
@OrderAmount = OrderAmount,
@OrderAmountScheduled...
March 1, 2006 at 6:02 am
DDL = data description language, which means the creation statements for your tables in this case.
Is the following, what you mean? :
On an event, multiple races take place(e).
For...
March 1, 2006 at 5:33 am
Post the DDL please. For now, I recommend, you qualify your joins. SQL Qyery Optimizer interprets, true, but are your joins MEANT to be what is interpreted? e.g. INNER, LEFT...
March 1, 2006 at 5:16 am
>P.S. What a stupid idea to have date and time 1st - separated, 2nd - in varchar!<
True. But I know where it originates ...
March 1, 2006 at 4:34 am
Why make things simple when there are so many beautiful ways of complicating them?
I suppose, your Calendar doesn't use correct datetime-format either ...
SELECT
SUM(DATEDIFF(ss,convert(datetime, RecvdDate + ' ' + RecvdTime),convert(datetime,...
March 1, 2006 at 4:29 am
Have you checked, whether the object is really created?
Next, are you sure, that you don't have to initiate some method on your object? I mean, you pass a parameter, do...
March 1, 2006 at 4:15 am
Serqiy is completely right, as far as design is concerned, but if you can't change design anymore, there's still another solution:
Since you will not have an infinite number of...
March 1, 2006 at 4:03 am
That's the >furthermore< script, monsieur, illustrating what - CETERIS PARIBUS - is meant by the omission of an unnecessary grouping and ordering, not the proposed statement.
February 28, 2006 at 5:04 pm
I suggest you cast only one of them, the one with the extended time information. You don't have to care about the format, since internally there's no difference in the...
February 28, 2006 at 7:51 am
I'm afraid, the table has no fields as well
Do you have a primary key that incorporates some logic, sort of identity-like procedure?
Otherwise, if...
February 28, 2006 at 4:14 am
No, I still don't! For an obvious reason - there's no need to
Have a look at the whole thing: I did NOT...
February 28, 2006 at 4:03 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 116 total)