Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 116 total)
>I have a question: Why the dbo. ?<
the object owner (here dbo. = DataBaseOwner) is always an integral part of naming in SQL-Server. This is true for all objects (tables, procedures...
March 1, 2006 at 4:30 pm
>But your observations are assumptions also<
True - I always assume the worst. Advisable practice, as far as reality is concerned
Do we start a new thread on...
March 1, 2006 at 4:16 pm
Provides the remainder of one number divided by another.
dividend % divisor
Why not use, what's already there? Too straightforward, I suppose ...
March 1, 2006 at 11:21 am
There's a new feature in SQL-2005: DELETE TOP (n). That's for you. I hate to manipulate data this way. This seems to me a...
March 1, 2006 at 11:18 am
Sum(CASE tblDataTableNew.CustType='Wachovia' THEN ImageItems ELSE 0 END) AS WviaImage
March 1, 2006 at 11:07 am
As for performance and large amounts of data it might even prove useful to first drop the index and recreate it afterwards, but that depends on the data ...
March 1, 2006 at 11:03 am
Apart from the above mentioned problem, you'll always update the values, whether they've changed or not. This should not happen either. Think of this in terms of performance.
There's still another...
March 1, 2006 at 10:49 am
Again, David. One thing in advance: I think we all know Celko's nice SQL puzzles, here for example calculating running sums or ordering records using plain SQL.
I'm a supporter of plain...
March 1, 2006 at 10:41 am
I'm pretty sure, I know and I knew, what you mean, but let me state again, what I already wrote in a prior message:
>it is still NOT clear, whether...
March 1, 2006 at 8:50 am
Just have a look at what will happen when you restart with this situation being the starting point: (again 350 to schedule)
1, 2006/3/1, 100.000, MATERIAL1,50
2, 2006/3/3, 200.000, MATERIAL1,0
3, 2006/3/3, 150.000,...
March 1, 2006 at 8:39 am
True, but the old standard will be discontinued.
>Ultimately the engine will translte the first into the second.
If the meaning is clear, yes. But this is not always the case.
Ok,...
March 1, 2006 at 8:25 am
I'm really not trying to define YOUR VERY OWN goals, but be very, very careful with the second solution Drop me a message,...
March 1, 2006 at 8:10 am
This means, you didn't understand the goal either
March 1, 2006 at 7:57 am
I suggest you use first syntax if you're british, and second, if you're american. If you're neither, simply switch from time to time
possible solutions:
a) use second...
March 1, 2006 at 7:53 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 116 total)