Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)

  • Reply To: Has Everyone Had a Data Breach?

    Steve,

    Great topic. I think the more appropriate question would be; is there any company that has not had a data breach?

    We see in the news, time and time again every...

  • Reply To: Can We Please Stop Sending Passwords Over the Wire?

    Maxtardiveau,

    I agree with what you’re saying. When I worked at Dell Computers, we presented a similar issue to Microsoft in relation to the Microsoft Office suite. Their response was “it’s...

  • Reply To: Going Back to the Basics

    Scott wrote:

    (Any thoughts on article concepts focusing on "going back to basics" and "relearning the essentials"?)

    I don’t know if this is still an idea...

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 11 months ago by  Aubrey Love.
  • Reply To: The Double Table

    Jeffry,

    I suppose my wife is somewhat correct in accusing me of being OCD. I have a tendency to group my constraints by constraint type, then table name, then column name.

    All...

  • Reply To: The Double Table

    Jeffrey,

    Actually I've never had that issue.  (Yet!)

    In that scenario, I would have to break tradition and add the schema name prefix to the table name when naming the constraint.

  • Reply To: The Double Table

    Jeff,

    I don’t see a need to call the “column name” on the PRIMARY KEY either. But, since I use the 3-part naming convention on all the other constraints, I just...

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by  Aubrey Love.
  • Reply To: The Double Table

    Maybe I’m out of sync with all others, but I have always preferred the 3-part naming convention.

    “PK_tableName_columnName”

    This allows for distinct constraints in one table. For example, if I have multiple...

  • Reply To: The Double Table

    This is a good reminder to all that a constraint is an object just like tables, views, functions, triggers, etc. Since you are trying to create two objects with the...

  • Reply To: Do We Need to Learn Linux?

    Sean Redmond,

    Here are couple of options for online training that I would recommend.

    Option 1:

    Linux full course: (YouTube) about 7.5 hours using Ubuntu, Zorin, etc.

    Link - The Complete Linux Course: Beginner...

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by  Aubrey Love. Reason: Clarifying the links
  • Reply To: Seeking Growth

    Mastery level: to know everything there is to possibly know about a given subject without the need of an outside reference.

    True, you are on the mark with my point. In...

  • Reply To: Seeking Growth

    “Jack of all trades, master of none.” That is the phrase that first comes to my mind while reading this article. That has been my life’s story.  I have worked...

  • Reply To: Article Review

    I know this thread is a little old, but if you are still looking for reviewers, I would love to help. I see a lot of articles on this site...

  • Reply To: The Next Evolution of Big Blue

    I’m going to have to side with Jeff on this one. With on-premise servers, both the initial and long-term costs may be more than the cloud, financially speaking. However, what...

  • Reply To: The Coping Thread

    Heh... almost forgot... "Seatbelts save lives" (at least people laughing so hard)

     

    Alas, my office chair is not equipped with a seat belt, just a couple of retainer rails,...

  • Reply To: The Coping Thread

    Thanks. I'll put together an article and submit it to see how things tic along.

    I read the contributor pages, seems fairly straight forward.

     

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)