Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
Thanks a lot for the replies - especially as they pretty much matched what I said off the top of my head at the time (my manager looked aghast at...
November 17, 2016 at 4:00 am
Hmmm.. very quiet here on this subject - only 18 views in 2 days and I think four or five of those are me.
Oh well, fortunately somebody answered this for...
July 15, 2015 at 4:28 am
While I have an appreciation for a limited budget, it is much more expensive to have to come up with these types of workarounds than it is to buy more...
March 10, 2015 at 3:49 am
That's true, if I drop the database and re-run that script the same values come back, if I drop the table different values are used. But those second values are...
October 16, 2014 at 7:15 am
Thanks wolfkillj that was a good suggestion which would have helped track the problem down. As it is the penny dropped about 40 minutes ago when we found a job...
September 22, 2014 at 5:23 am
This actually, as a smarter colleague demonstrated, was caused by a stored procedure call that for some reason needed to be recompiled and was too much for the optimizer. We...
September 13, 2014 at 8:26 am
Ok don't worry - just one of those weird desktop issues I guess. Re-imaged my workstation - lost nearly a day but all ok now.
September 19, 2013 at 8:46 am
Thanks for all the positive feedback so far, in particular raulggonzalez for covering off the NULL issue I'd overlooked.
For the less confident raulggonzalez's line needs to be inserted into the...
May 14, 2013 at 8:24 am
Sorry, management are happy to leave this one on a legacy 2005 instance and I can only pursue in my own time. I can post the stack dump though.
I did...
May 28, 2012 at 3:59 pm
After the stack dump in the log a line appears:
During upgrade, database raised exception 211, severity 23, state 72, address 00000000004A1A24. Use the exception number to determine the cause.
May 25, 2012 at 7:38 am
The plot thickens. It turns out I am able to restore the backup to a different 2005 instance. On 2008 and 2008 R2 instances on separate machines this causes the...
May 25, 2012 at 7:31 am
DBCC CHECKCATALOG (MY_DB)
just gives me the typical "DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator."
May 25, 2012 at 7:01 am
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned that the transaction will never complete. Nobody else looking at the database will ever see any of the rows added!
March 29, 2012 at 9:49 am
Thanks, it is indeed a permissions issue. I've checked and found that the ability to compile stored procedures in the publisher db comes and goes with membership of the dbo...
January 20, 2012 at 7:27 am
Belated thanks Roy - why indeed? This is certainly the way to do it, might get rid of the time-consuming backup/restore to do it properly like this in the fullness...
September 13, 2011 at 8:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)