Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 5,102 total)
Merge was designed for loosely connected systems that occasionally synchronize their data. Example SalesForce.
Peer-to-Peer was simply an extension of bi-directional transactional replication with low latency in mind.
It is useful in...
April 29, 2010 at 10:07 am
Well ... that depends soooooo much on the place !!!!
It is usually employed on very large organizations.
Where I work for example we don't have titles and compensation is...
April 29, 2010 at 7:59 am
what exactly is "real-time" about this ? 🙁
April 29, 2010 at 7:28 am
mister.magoo (4/28/2010)
April 28, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Your Server name, Your network connectivity or a defined alias is preventing distribution agent to connect.
April 28, 2010 at 11:58 am
A LOT!
Merge replication
- is trigger based
- It uses only merge agent
- It could be set to track column changes instead of row changes
- It could optimize the final changes...
April 28, 2010 at 11:53 am
I am sure that the "CASE" version is way much faster!
April 27, 2010 at 1:11 pm
Something like this ?
SELECT [Contract].ProjNumber, [Contract].Description, [Contractor].[Name], [Contractor].City,
MIN([Estimate].Estimate) OVER(PARTITION BY Estimate.ProjNumber) as "Lowest Estimate"
FROM Contractor INNER JOIN
[Estimate] ON Contractor.ConNumber = [Estimate].ConNumber INNER JOIN
[Contract] ON Estimate.ProjNumber = [Contract].ProjNumber
GROUP BY
[Contract].ProjNumber, [Contract].Description, Contractor.[Name],...
April 27, 2010 at 12:16 pm
Maybe something like :
SELECT @intPeriodID,
MAX(CASE WHEN PeriodId = @intPeriodID THEN PeriodName + ' (' + CAST(WorkDays...
April 27, 2010 at 12:09 pm
Did you restart the LogReader agent?
April 27, 2010 at 11:49 am
LogReader only replicates "committed" transactions.
IF you have a PK violation on the primary it *wont* replicate because the action is rolledback.
IF you see that the values were replicated somehow they...
April 27, 2010 at 11:48 am
We have been using that for the past 5 years with the FAT FINGER case in mind!
April 12, 2010 at 9:57 am
One more comment: The use of READPAST should be carefully considered for two reasons:
1. If you need to preserve the order you must exclude it
2. If you are using READ_COMMITED_SNAPSHOT...
April 5, 2010 at 8:19 am
You will have to make "smarter" index maintenance.
- If you can isolate only the necessary indexes that will help alot with the availability.
- Secondly you will have to see if...
March 16, 2010 at 1:13 pm
I don't tend to praise a lot of articles, this one has my 5 stars!
Great Job.
March 16, 2010 at 7:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 5,102 total)