Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 5,102 total)
Another missing point here is that all of this depends on table size, indexes in place and data distribution the plans can change depending all of this
It is never...
July 22, 2010 at 7:18 am
iwegbue3 (7/7/2010)
I have a Transactional replication setup with updateable subscription. I tried bulk copying data from the subscriber down to the Publisher and it throws up the error message,...
July 7, 2010 at 7:21 am
here is one example of how the Query optimizer can use FK metadata.
Now on to your non-trusted issue.
The reason replication marks them as non-trusted is because you could potentially use...
July 6, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Check this out: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/transactsql/thread/bba53aeb-6bdf-4cfb-b62f-fc4443e171c0/[/url]
July 6, 2010 at 1:59 pm
iwegbue3 (7/5/2010)
I have a Transactional replication setup with updateable subscription. I tried bulk copying data from the subscriber down to the Publisher and it throws up the error message,...
July 6, 2010 at 1:56 pm
This means we will no longer be able to use replication, as a 2000 publisher cannot have a 2008 subscriber.
That's false.
You can!
June 29, 2010 at 12:15 pm
Just change the temptable from "local" # to global ##
then from a different connection read it without nay locking like: "select * from ##debugtable with (nolock)"
June 29, 2010 at 11:58 am
ZenDada (6/25/2010)
noeld (6/25/2010)
ZenDada (6/25/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (6/25/2010)
Keyword here is connection. These are stable for the connection. @@identity doesn't scope to your connection or that table.
As usual, Pinal Dave has...
June 25, 2010 at 1:09 pm
declare @t table (order_number int, dte datetime)
insert into @t (order_number, dte )
select 5000 i, '06/01/2010' d union all
select 4900, '04/01/2010' union all
select 3800, '01/01/2010' union all
select 2500,...
June 25, 2010 at 1:06 pm
SQLJocky (6/25/2010)
Thank you for making that distinction for others that may read this. I hadn't thought to include that.
Actually thank *you* for bringing up this issue which is not...
June 25, 2010 at 12:44 pm
select customer_id, count(*) cnt
from orders
where orderdate > (getdate() -150)
group by customer_id
June 25, 2010 at 12:32 pm
SQLJocky (6/25/2010)
Correct. Queued.
Now it makes sense and in fact BOL is a bit non-clear(cryptic) when telling you that your queued transactions will only reach the primary after you fail...
June 25, 2010 at 12:28 pm
First I will recommend you to verify that the linked server created in the Subscriber "works"
Second Verify that Both Subscriber and primary have MSDTC "running"
If the above is ok:
...
June 25, 2010 at 12:26 pm
How is it possible that the production server is "denormalized" and the reporting is "normalized"... I have seen it the other way around though.
June 25, 2010 at 11:53 am
SQLJocky (6/23/2010)
June 25, 2010 at 11:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 5,102 total)