Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 91 total)
It is a good series of articles and the comment wasn't intended to be negative, I was just pointing out the possibility of settin up a VM cluster without creating...
August 15, 2011 at 5:04 pm
Do you actually need the NAS element? I know you can create the shared storage on VM Server just by tweaking the properties of the storage so it can be...
August 15, 2011 at 2:45 pm
The technology will improve but the appetite to store, retrieve and report on information will always stay a step ahead as the appetite cannot be fulfilled, it is limitless. Also...
May 14, 2011 at 3:37 pm
Clustered index leaf level is the data.
May 12, 2011 at 4:52 pm
Transportable filegroups would be nice.
🙂 it is almost Christmas. 🙂
December 16, 2009 at 2:59 pm
This has always seemed like a glaring omission to me, since the sort of environments that need Enterprise Edition and partitioning, are very likely to also have a very minimal...
December 14, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Yes Enterprise Editon and it has to be ONLINE, apologies for omitting that.
December 14, 2009 at 4:32 am
Thanks for the reply but my initial statement stands. There is no benefit in partitioning SQL Server 2005 indexes when it comes to maintaining these indexes as you cannot rebuild...
December 11, 2009 at 3:41 pm
whats hardware is it running on?
December 11, 2009 at 9:08 am
If I create a database in full recovery mode in SQL Server 2008, then add 1000 records, then 500 more, and then do a log backup, can I recover to...
December 22, 2008 at 8:03 am
you can call
wmic volume get caption,capacity,freespace
to get the freespace on all drives including mount points.
Make this call from xp_cmdshell and place the results into a table if you want...
December 19, 2008 at 7:48 am
Interesting article.
Just a note - xp_fixeddrives doesn't return any space info on mount points in the filesystem below the drive letters. If you have database file in such locations thats...
December 19, 2008 at 6:41 am
As well as the degree of fragmentation you should consider the sort of queries run against the tables. If these result in mostly index seeks with no or almost no...
October 4, 2008 at 12:51 pm
The thing that caught me on this is that SQL Server does not require any secondary data files and so it could be considered that .ndf is not a "default"...
September 2, 2008 at 10:04 am
Whats your views on the cost?
September 2, 2008 at 3:08 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 91 total)