Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
which one should I use newline or \r? Or can I test for both?
Also, how would I have to change my code to include this?
February 28, 2008 at 10:00 am
How can i check that?
I am just baffled as the system was able to connect just fine to the db, but then over the weekend security patches were installed. ...
February 25, 2008 at 8:24 am
It's not my brilliant idea. Interesting though that why would MS provide the registry solution if increasing beyond 99 doesn't work? why would they publish this fix?
February 13, 2008 at 9:49 am
yeah, i can confirm that it is ignoring the registry stuff. Ok - hopefully MS will have an answer to all of this.
February 12, 2008 at 2:10 pm
Thanks for the info. i'll take a look. I'm using SQL Server 2005, 9.0.2050
February 12, 2008 at 1:54 pm
I'm on SQL Server 2005, the solution for greater than 99 is to edit the registry (MS solution)...I'm not understanding your comment reg. recycling and it set back to 99...how...
February 12, 2008 at 1:44 pm
I did run EXEC sp_cycle_errorlog; again so that it would force a new error log but it still shows the active one and then logs numbered 1 through 6 (total...
February 12, 2008 at 1:42 pm
SSCrazy,
You do have to do it in the registry if you want more than 99...can't do it in Enterprise Mgr.
February 12, 2008 at 1:29 pm
I am in the process of convincing them of this (backing up old ones) but they want to consult MS, so I said in the meanwhile I'd do my research....
February 12, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I guess it didn't show me that, that means my registry change did not take effect...now I need to figure out somehow why it didn't.....yeah tell me about it. ...
February 12, 2008 at 1:20 pm
I did and got this message:
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
it doesn't give me the info I need....
February 12, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)