Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
Thanks for your suggestions. I guess simple join would work out for this scenario. I would reach out to this forum in case if I face problem on mapping for...
May 27, 2008 at 11:03 pm
Thanks for your reply. We think passing the datatype along with the parameters in XML format, would be better than hitting the INFORMATION SCHEMA tables.
Thanks,
Nags
May 27, 2008 at 11:01 pm
Thanks Matt. It was clear on when to choose Output Clause over Trigger.
Nags
May 27, 2008 at 10:52 pm
Thanks for your replies. I understand Trigger has more benefits than the Output Clause. Only thing I am worried about is the Performance of the Trigger. Is there any performance...
May 27, 2008 at 10:25 am
Grant & Jack,
Thanks for your reply. DRI is surely important.
10 to 15 ms for the referential integrity check would not be an issue. Will it be a concern/ suspected to...
May 27, 2008 at 4:29 am
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. We are still debating on choosing the Column Vs Extension tables approach.
I understand the constraint on fixing the attributes count to 25. We are in the...
May 23, 2008 at 5:12 am
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
My problem here is the Attributes in the Container are dynamic. Also the Ticket information would be spread across multiple tables. In that case, I need...
May 22, 2008 at 3:39 am
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I understand the Pivot is for generating grouping/ aggregating reports. I will check the link that you have provided.
I am planning to use Multi-Tenant -...
May 7, 2008 at 1:38 am
Hi,
I need to convert rows into columns for the following table values.
Attribute_ID Attr_Value
1 'Test'
2...
May 6, 2008 at 8:05 am
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)