Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
ps (12/19/2008)
It'll wait for the first update to finish as first update has acquired a rowlock; 2nd one cannot update the rows held by the lock created by 1st update.
Understood....
December 19, 2008 at 1:12 am
GilaMonster (12/19/2008)
nKognito (12/19/2008)
Thanks for your help, but I know where deadlock occures.
Are you sure? You know what the victim is, but without the deadlock graph there's no way to...
December 19, 2008 at 1:01 am
Thanks for your help, but I know where deadlock occures. THe problem is I do not understand why! Why two paralel update queries can execute parallel!? It means (by profiler)...
December 19, 2008 at 12:44 am
I understand but it is not good for me. I have a million works to do and 100 users (for example) - one of them more "usefull" other less and...
December 19, 2008 at 12:17 am
Thanks for your reply! Your advise may help me at save work mechamism, but still I have a problem at get work. I have checked with profiler on two users...
December 18, 2008 at 11:51 pm
I do not have any bottlenecks right now. All that I want is to understand is there any simple way to improve SQL server performance and throughput by adding new...
May 13, 2008 at 5:17 am
Let me explain my problem:
I have a one table with huge data size (its about millions records and gigabytes in size) and without any foreign keys. My actions are selection...
May 13, 2008 at 12:06 am
Thanks for your replies! I will check every suggestion. One more question: what do you think about technology that called linked servers - can it improve performance and bandwidth? I...
May 12, 2008 at 1:36 am
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)