Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
This is just another idea, I don't know if it is of any value for you.
We have one package that includes 30-40 lookups. We had to split the flow into...
March 28, 2008 at 5:46 am
Andrew,
I also used your approach - in a project some years ago - to create all possible procedures. If you do this in advance, your users do not need privileges...
February 28, 2008 at 6:12 am
Did you try sp_refreshview?
Perhaps the structure of your underlying table(s) has changed...
Ola
September 12, 2007 at 1:44 am
I happened to have a UDF in my test box that returns a set of numbers, so it was very easy for me to put this together:
select
case...
May 28, 2007 at 2:24 am
This is maybe not the best option. But I needed to do a similar thing yesterday and ended up converting the input string to a 19 char string. This way the milliseconds...
March 22, 2007 at 4:30 am
Yes. We too switched to Microsoft. No problems ever since. (The driver is slower though. At least when previewing data.)
Ola
March 1, 2007 at 9:35 am
John,
Obviously, FT search is the proper choice.
When reading Joseph's first post again, I realize he needs to put BOTH leading and trailing wildcards. My suggestion fits, when there is only a...
January 27, 2005 at 3:14 am
I have had to implement something like this on a MSDE, where FT search is not included.
I then added a column 'ReverseName' thats stores select reverse(Name). Whenever a search condition...
January 26, 2005 at 1:22 am
I may have completely misunderstood your intention. But if what you are looking for is to get only the Respondents who have completed all Surveys (or whatever the StatFlagId represents), then...
January 14, 2005 at 1:32 am
This can be a useful link : http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
November 11, 2004 at 6:02 am
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)