Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Hi mike.johnson, I suggest you create a view for your query with whatever WHERE clause is required then execute the stored procedure calling the view. Thanks
December 3, 2013 at 11:55 am
Hi Sector7, yes, I've made a few assumptions about configuration and access rights with this and haven't coded for every possible error.
December 3, 2013 at 11:53 am
Hi
Just submitted an updated version of the script to address to identity issue.
Thanks
November 25, 2013 at 10:12 am
Thanks Hugo, feeling much better after reading your post. Thought I had Monday morning madness.
September 9, 2013 at 6:41 am
Thought the typo was actually a trick so selected error for both. Turns out it's just a typo! 🙁
September 4, 2013 at 6:15 am
Hi, just wondering why you would do this and not just use the model database? Thanks
September 4, 2013 at 12:26 am
Good point! Generally I've been dumping out views of data where identity values hadn't been included so didn't spot this issue.
Thanks for the feedback
Paul
August 27, 2013 at 6:40 am
Hi
Nice framework, we use something similar to load are data warehouses each night, but create the parallel processes dynamically as SQL agent jobs. Gives you a bit more visibility on...
August 14, 2013 at 6:09 am
Thanks Scott, I was a little confused by the SQL injection comment from Eric in relation to this script. Espically when something like an ASP.Net web app gives you all...
August 14, 2013 at 12:37 am
Hi Eric
You could use the system procedure sp_MSforeachdb to create a none dynamic version, but you'll still need to pass it a SQL string and check for the users existence...
August 10, 2013 at 2:22 am
Nice, didn't realise there was such a system procedure to do that! Many thanks
July 30, 2013 at 1:58 pm
In one of our data warehouses we deploy similar database schemes to handle customer data sets. From time to time it's useful to know which databases contain the same objects,...
July 30, 2013 at 12:05 am
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)