Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
... although "what were you thinking" feels right, too.
April 17, 2023 at 2:20 pm
Right, a CTE can dynamically construct a table the same as a VALUES clause. It wouldn't be nice for very many rows, though -- but that wasn't the question :).
February 2, 2022 at 2:03 pm
Something will arise to fill this void. I'm curious about what it will look like. Until then, I'll miss presentations by folks like Kathi Kellenberger at local SQL Saturdays.
December 26, 2020 at 6:00 pm
Good question. I need more coffee this morning.
August 27, 2019 at 11:29 am
That is interesting, thanks for the question. Have never used a "fire & forget" pattern myself...
That's a good thing.
June 21, 2019 at 2:01 pm
The recommended pattern in any conversation is:
In cases where the initiator...
June 21, 2019 at 1:59 pm
I like that there have been more Service Broker questions lately. We're beginning to make more use of SSSB to control process flow in our application.
May 24, 2019 at 3:27 pm
Nice question - plus a little bonus DYAC-style humor
April 19, 2019 at 12:18 pm
This is what I get in SQL Server 2017 when I attempt to create a memory-optimized table with initial and increment both equal to 5:
February 26, 2019 at 6:50 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy