Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 84 total)
Sorry for the delay lads
Sean, apologies I'm on here long enough to know what I should have included with this one, please see below for sample data and existing query:
CREATE...
August 24, 2015 at 4:57 am
Thanks for all the help on this guys, all answers were good, vladan's made the most sense on this
I think what was bugging me most was that I had it...
August 7, 2015 at 9:20 am
But why doesn't Partition By sp.Name order by sp.Name work in that regard?
I've tried dumping the result set into a temp table and doing the same (removing any problems that...
August 7, 2015 at 6:56 am
Hi vladan, that works, thank you
I still don't understand though why the partition by sp.name order by sp.name doesn't work here.
From my understanding it should be doing the same thing
August 7, 2015 at 6:30 am
No Gila, you're supposed to say just flick it over to 110 and everything will be fine 🙂
Thought as much anyway, it should be ok as I have some good...
July 20, 2015 at 7:56 am
Hi Gila - In terms of testing what the implications would be for changing the compatibility mode from 90 to 110, what would be the best way of verifying that...
July 20, 2015 at 7:41 am
Not sure Frank, it was quite sometime ago and it was in a different company so I don't have access to the stuff I was using then.
Best I can remember...
June 17, 2015 at 10:40 am
Thought it might be something like that, thanks for the clarification Tom
Unfortunately for me, this is the first of many sp's I'll be changing which all have a number of...
June 17, 2015 at 2:08 am
Can anyone tell me the 'official' reason why such behaviour occurs on SQL server when comparing float values.
If I run my code again, the values might match and I...
June 15, 2015 at 4:21 am
Forget the NULLs, it was down to the floats.
While investigating this I started using other queries using joins and comparing one value to the other in a WHERE clause which...
June 12, 2015 at 7:41 am
Thought so too but unfortunately it still seems to be failing the EXCEPT comparison.
If I wrap ISNULLS around these values with a 1 for replacement value it works
If I cast...
June 12, 2015 at 7:15 am
My guess is that this is something around local policy on the machine. Unfortunately, all of this is locked down so I can't look into it further but having similar...
November 28, 2014 at 3:05 am
The job step is running under proxy/credential which runs fine when the job owner is sa or running under my colleague. When the job owner is set to me fails...
November 27, 2014 at 9:34 am
Cheers Matt, worked a treat.
Don't suppose you have any experience with setting up a SAS data set as a linked server by any chance?
November 6, 2014 at 2:30 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 84 total)