Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 45 total)
Problem solved?
By using a lokal sql user account on the 2000 machine it works.
I have seen referred to as "the two-hop-problem".
Can anybody explain this?
I know it works but not why...
July 13, 2007 at 4:00 am
Afterthought:
The sql server 2000 which is unreachable is on a win 2000-server.
The sql server 2000 which is reachable is on a win XP.
Can that be a clue?
/k
July 13, 2007 at 3:45 am
I have tried connection to another sql server 2000 machine.
If I have sql running under Local system or under a domain account doesnt matter, it works on that machine.
However onto...
July 13, 2007 at 3:42 am
I am using "Be made using this security context"
And that account has adequate rights in the remote 2000 server.
/k
July 13, 2007 at 2:49 am
Thanks.
Yes, tomorrow I will stop duplicates, they were due to a front end programmer error.
The code is a simplified version from my original table, thats why it looks as it...
January 23, 2007 at 5:31 am
I finally arrived at this:
create table dbo.Numbers (
Number1 integer not null,
Number2 integer not null,
)
go
delete
from
August 31, 2006 at 4:06 am
Workaround:
DECLARE
@OrderBy varchar(33)
SET
@OrderBy = 'Number3'
SELECT
X1,
August 23, 2006 at 12:23 am
Found a workaround:
DECLARE @OrderBy varchar(33)
SET @OrderBy = 'Number3'
SELECT X1, X2 FROM
(SELECT N1 = A.Number1
, N2 = A.Number2
FROM dbo.Numbers A) X (X1,X2)
ORDER BY CASE
WHEN @OrderBy =...
August 22, 2006 at 3:09 am
Tried it on SQL2000 and also SQL2005:
--doesnt work
DECLARE
@OrderBy integer
SET
August 22, 2006 at 12:24 am
My reasons for sending un-named parameters are 2:
1. I suspect it is better to send as little data as possible over the network. Why send the parameter names if you...
August 25, 2003 at 6:13 am
Before .NET we had a DAL with support both for named and unnamed parameters. That became possible with ADO 2.6.
With ADO.NET I can have named parameters only with SQL...
August 22, 2003 at 12:24 am
The only way I know of is by means of xp_cmdshell and osql/isql.
February 6, 2003 at 12:57 pm
quote:
You cannot, unfortunately, lock the SP from running in limited fashion. That is the reason for transactions and locking to prevent access...
February 6, 2003 at 12:42 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 45 total)