Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 60 total)
Great discussion guys.....that comment about the rounding upon division was something I had not considered.
It sounds like division on DECIMAL(9,2) would produce a result that could be "off" by 1...
August 11, 2015 at 7:18 am
Yes, but couldn't a fact table have a surrogate with a secondary composite key that is declared unique ?
August 10, 2015 at 11:13 am
Try unchecking those options and do a manual refresh.
However, based on your description, it sounds like this query is not a pass-through and therefore not well optimized.
You should create a...
August 10, 2015 at 8:37 am
What are the Connection Properties set to: ??
[ ] Enable background refresh
[ ] Refresh every XX minutes
[ ] Refresh data when opening the file
How long does the query run natively...
August 10, 2015 at 7:10 am
Thanks Guys. I think decimal(9,2) is adequate....and it uses only 5 bytes.
The only problem :
when summing large numbers of rows....that could result in overflow if it is not re-cast,...
August 10, 2015 at 7:02 am
Thanks guys (and especially Jeff) for the great responses.
There's a data warehouse manager here who practically made everything varchar(1000).
There are no indices in any of the tables yet, so when...
August 10, 2015 at 6:33 am
re: "but they're not suitable for the fact table"
That was my feeling all along.
Thanks for chiming in Eric...and thanks for the reference to the book.
July 10, 2015 at 6:49 am
Thanks for chiming in Eric....that was my feeling all along.
July 10, 2015 at 6:48 am
Thanks so much for your feedback Steve.
It would really be a great study in design and performance....I wish someone ELSE had already done it !!!
July 9, 2015 at 2:48 pm
I see what you mean, but what about the FACT table ?
The idea was to place the converted BigInt keys to the dimension tables in there.
Thus, when loading either FACT...
July 9, 2015 at 6:50 am
Thanks Steve.
re: "lineage back to the source record".
Good point, but to do the conversion to BigInt, we would have a reference table with the GUID's and new BigInt references.
There would...
July 8, 2015 at 9:41 am
Sounds as though you got a bad download of the install package....and/or an error occurred when burning the installation to DVD.
Try re-downloading or burning a new DVD.
March 16, 2015 at 9:16 am
re: "with distributed systems"
And I now I finally "see it".
Thanks Steve..... and everyone else for responding.....
February 24, 2015 at 12:04 pm
re: "GUIDs give you a large space of possibilities."
I understand, but I would never use an Autonumber/Sequence as a key reference to a product or client, etc.
Instead, I would have...
February 24, 2015 at 9:18 am
Thanks.....
How does the newid() function work ?
How does it know to create a unique value for a particular table ?
Why use a GUID vs. Autonumber/Sequence ?
February 24, 2015 at 7:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 60 total)