Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
James A Skipwith (2/22/2013)
February 22, 2013 at 8:20 am
ScottPletcher (2/21/2013)
February 22, 2013 at 3:31 am
rice.tx (2/21/2013)
It's not clear to me... did you try using filtered indexes with...
February 22, 2013 at 3:20 am
That is correct, and one of the limitations of this solution. In my scenario the maintenance of the index does not add a lot of overhead but I could see...
February 21, 2013 at 8:19 am
cmille19 (10/22/2008)
October 23, 2008 at 12:48 am
cmille19 (10/22/2008)
"...differences between a say 32 bit 2 GB RAM SQL2000 Standard on NT4 Server and a 64 bit 32 GB RAM SQL2005 Standard on...
October 22, 2008 at 1:18 pm
I went for a tinyint in the end, and have learnt a lot more about bit fields, thanks.
I had indexed a couple of bit fields up to now as I...
August 7, 2002 at 2:38 am
MS have notification services planned for SQL server on dot net framework solution but its still in beta I think. Might be worth a look.
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/NS/overview.asp
I implemented a messaging...
August 6, 2002 at 10:57 am
Another Fox user since Fox/Dbase came out.
I can not think a text file would be better(?) in any circumstances other than ease of data interchange
We have rewritten our entire line...
August 6, 2002 at 2:47 am
Thanks for your help - I am going to use a different way as suggested rather than sp_oa calls.
I never did get the code to work even as sysadmin either...
July 29, 2002 at 10:21 am
The functionality would be used infrequently , say once per day it would probably run. I have tried to avoid automation up to now as it does look klunky but...
July 27, 2002 at 1:09 am
I agree with other contributors and add the following info from real usage in a very similar scenario.
The maximum number of (SQL2000 merge) simple 'transactions' I have down over a...
July 23, 2002 at 2:00 am
Do you have a service running called Performance Data log. This is the service version of performance monitor (and can be very useful). I installed it on my workstation many...
June 12, 2002 at 2:01 am
In my original reply I meant to say WAN instead of LAN, sorry !
June 5, 2002 at 8:57 am
I have seen this a few times - in my cases it was always due to 1)poor network connectivity across a LAN or 2)the Windows NT/2000 'server' process which runs...
June 5, 2002 at 5:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)