Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
EdVassie (1/21/2009)
January 21, 2009 at 10:05 am
Matt Miller (1/19/2009)
Developer edition to developer edition should do fine.
(LOL) That's good -- because it's the only game plan we have at this point . . .
Thanks much (!)
January 19, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Matt Miller (1/19/2009)
Perry Whittle (1/19/2009)
January 19, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Hi Perry . . .
(1) We backed out the upgrade we tried over the weekend . . . and will try again next weekend.
(2) Right now, we're assuming that the...
January 19, 2009 at 11:40 am
When I connect to any of the 4 instances via SSMS . . . the @@version comes back as:
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May...
January 18, 2009 at 12:07 pm
(1) Still not sure that SS2005 was installed sucessfully during the upgrade process.
(2) When I go into the SQL Server 2005 Surface Area Configuration, for example, the database engine is...
January 18, 2009 at 11:55 am
Okay -- thanks.
Let me see what happens when I try to connect to each of the instances . . .
January 18, 2009 at 10:36 am
installed instances:
SBSMONITORING
MSSQLSERVER
COW0
MSSQL$COW0
January 18, 2009 at 10:32 am
Four installed instances. I'm connecting to COW0 -- which comes up fine as far as it goes, but it's 8.0 . . .
January 18, 2009 at 10:31 am
I'm accessing COW0 with Management Studio -- that's got our production database and it's okay. It's just coming up as 2000.
January 18, 2009 at 10:27 am
Apparently . . . four instances of MSSQLSERVER and 4 corresponding SQLAgents.
But they're all SS2000, as best I can figure . . .
January 18, 2009 at 10:25 am
Right -- what does this tell us please?
January 18, 2009 at 10:09 am
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)