Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
EdVassie (1/21/2009)
January 21, 2009 at 10:05 am
Matt Miller (1/19/2009)
Developer edition to developer edition should do fine.
(LOL) That's good -- because it's the only game plan we have at this point . . .
Thanks much (!)
January 19, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Matt Miller (1/19/2009)
Perry Whittle (1/19/2009)
January 19, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Hi Perry . . .
(1) We backed out the upgrade we tried over the weekend . . . and will try again next weekend.
(2) Right now, we're assuming that the...
January 19, 2009 at 11:40 am
When I connect to any of the 4 instances via SSMS . . . the @@version comes back as:
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May...
January 18, 2009 at 12:07 pm
(1) Still not sure that SS2005 was installed sucessfully during the upgrade process.
(2) When I go into the SQL Server 2005 Surface Area Configuration, for example, the database engine is...
January 18, 2009 at 11:55 am
Okay -- thanks.
Let me see what happens when I try to connect to each of the instances . . .
January 18, 2009 at 10:36 am
installed instances:
SBSMONITORING
MSSQLSERVER
COW0
MSSQL$COW0
January 18, 2009 at 10:32 am
Four installed instances. I'm connecting to COW0 -- which comes up fine as far as it goes, but it's 8.0 . . .
January 18, 2009 at 10:31 am
I'm accessing COW0 with Management Studio -- that's got our production database and it's okay. It's just coming up as 2000.
January 18, 2009 at 10:27 am
Apparently . . . four instances of MSSQLSERVER and 4 corresponding SQLAgents.
But they're all SS2000, as best I can figure . . .
January 18, 2009 at 10:25 am
Right -- what does this tell us please?
January 18, 2009 at 10:09 am
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy