Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 93 total)
Thanks Peter, I do appreciate the insight in the differences you provided on the use of stored procedures in Oracle vs SQLSever, however the real point of what I was after was...
February 21, 2006 at 8:44 am
Somebody call PETA, this poor kitty's has been skinned plenty!
February 10, 2006 at 11:04 am
Why not something as simple as:
---------------------------------------------------
DECLARE @col_mm_no smallint,
@col_yr_no smallint,
@dtDate datetime
SET @col_mm_no = 5
SET @col_yr_no = 2005
SET @dtDate = CAST(@col_mm_no AS CHAR) + '/1/' + CAST(@col_yr_no AS CHAR)
SELECT @dtDate
---------------------------------------------------
RETURNS:
2005-05-01 00:00:00.000
Which is in datetime format. Let the machine do...
February 10, 2006 at 6:56 am
Are you saying that all clients that access the ASP page from server 2 are exhibiting the same prompting before open behavior or that the prompt is occurring when you...
February 9, 2006 at 7:05 am
Thanks Gents for your responses. Ill take some time to see how the DateDiff approach might be used in my situation now that I think I know what's going on...
February 4, 2006 at 11:15 pm
I Haven't seen the DateDiff usage for grouping before, have typically used an approach like 'SELECT SUM(Amount) FROM Forecast WHERE DatePart(yy, acctperiod) BETWEEN @StartYear AND @EndYear' with the acctperiod column being a datetime. ...
February 2, 2006 at 11:05 pm
I like the numeric handling you proposed versus the char padding - didn't think of that trick. I can see that the BETWEEN operator will be used heavily as it...
February 1, 2006 at 1:05 pm
Thanks all for your replies.
I ran some statistics, albeit with limited data, on my own using execution plans to see what might the difference be between defining an accounting period...
February 1, 2006 at 10:33 am
Didn't finish my post before it magically fired off but you get the drift...anyway thanks for the reply.
I thought of the integer (February 2006 = 200602) approach but I was...
February 1, 2006 at 8:12 am
Didn't know I was presenting an argument...just stating that I've used a MUCK model under very strict circumstances for a very long time with no problems (honest). I agree the...
September 8, 2005 at 5:05 pm
...Change as in deletions from the list of values. If I feel this can be a possibility it is not a candidate for MUCK table. In more cases I will allow a...
September 8, 2005 at 4:23 pm
September 8, 2005 at 3:35 pm
(Hope this isn't a duplicate post as my first post seems to have bee sucked into a black hole...)
No argument that the use of separate tables is the quote 'best'...
September 8, 2005 at 12:41 pm
With all due respect to Mr. Celko, whose background I am familiar with and grasp of SQL internals is probably beyond compare, I felt your response was a little condescending and...
October 7, 2004 at 7:01 am
This is directed to Vince... I know this is a bit of time after this general thread was going on, but have been looking for a way to programmatically change...
August 25, 2004 at 12:04 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 93 total)