Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
I consider it myself.
IN is '=' and NOT IN is '<>'
Optimyzer is right.
July 29, 2004 at 8:34 pm
I do not know. But I think improvements of T-SQL is powerfull. Now we have recursion in our queries! We can exec select ... from MyTable inner join MyFunction(MyTable.Field). Notifications!!! And so...
July 28, 2004 at 8:40 pm
For this query
Select a
From @t1
Where a not in (select b from @t2)
optimizer generats next plan "((@t1.a = null or @t2.b = null) or @t1.a = @t2.b)"
and this query
declare
July 28, 2004 at 8:22 pm
There is no any query. But there is many ways. One of each is build tree in the table with triggers. I never explore it, but i think it possible.
If...
May 30, 2004 at 8:55 pm
if object_id('tmp') > 0 drop table tmp
create table tmp(id int, parentid int, code varchar(20))
insert into tmp values(1, 0, '123')
insert into tmp values(7, 6, '129')
insert into tmp values(2, 1, '124')
insert into...
May 28, 2004 at 3:46 am
But I think more powerfull to change insert algorithm. For example, create INSTED OF trigger or create a sp wich do insert or update to child table with additional fileds(item_subno1 and...
May 27, 2004 at 10:34 pm
Oops! Instead of smile picture ')'
May 27, 2004 at 10:23 pm
Does item_subno contains all alphabet?
May 27, 2004 at 10:05 pm
select item_no, item_subno_1 = case when item_subno = 'A' then item_subno end, item_subno2 = case when item_subno = 'B' then item_subno end
May 27, 2004 at 9:11 pm
Check the Maximum worker threads eith EM. Maybe you have to increase it.
May 26, 2004 at 9:19 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)