Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 210 total)
Got the answer from some expert. This just confirms that the sql version > 7.0.
May 23, 2012 at 6:49 pm
This is not my sp. These are the replication system sps. I don't understand why the version is validated everytime...
May 23, 2012 at 3:22 pm
Another crude method
select client_name,phone
from(
select temp.client,phone
from
(select [client],max(DATEs) datephone
from contact
group by client)temp
inner join contact
on contact.client = temp.client
and contact.dates = temp.datephone)tmp
inner join client
on client.client_id = tmp.client
May 2, 2012 at 3:45 pm
another way
select sqlserver_start_time from sys.dm_os_sys_info
February 15, 2012 at 12:09 pm
Actually i tried some common dmvs but don't know how to get the value of mirroring timeout and mirroring heartbeat. I know we can change this as follows:
ALTER DATABASE <dbname>...
February 15, 2012 at 12:01 pm
can't run the script
Msg 55555, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSforeach_worker, Line 92
sp_MSforeach_worker assert failed: command too long
April 11, 2011 at 7:45 pm
The sql service must be started after msdtc is started.
March 8, 2011 at 12:50 pm
This is something really new in SQL 2008 sp2. I shall verify the BOL and let you know if i find anything.
March 7, 2011 at 6:48 pm
Tweak the query timeout
March 7, 2011 at 6:29 pm
This value 684991 is not changing. This connection used this much cpu time that time only.
March 7, 2011 at 6:28 pm
AFAIK the log files are filled up sequentially. I believe following scenario in your case.
1. There are three log files ie LF1, LF2 and LF3
2. LF1 filled up.
3. LF2 started...
March 3, 2011 at 6:12 pm
try this
BEGIN TRAN test
DELETE tablename
FROM (SELECT Column
FROM
(
SELECT column/s, row_number() over(ORDER BY getdate()) as r
...
March 3, 2011 at 5:53 pm
Even 16 TB is going to be very heavy. Please look into other stats b4 proceed with a huge data.
-Lucky
March 3, 2011 at 5:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 210 total)