Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 100 total)
Why don't you set up a job to call your T-SQL code and schedule it for every morning? will save you work when youare in aswell.
Lloyd
June 17, 2004 at 10:58 am
thats the one,
thanks phil
June 17, 2004 at 12:28 am
hey susan,
i think sqlbill's on the right track. we had a similar problem within a multistep job where the first step of the job was to back up the database...
June 2, 2004 at 4:56 pm
jeff,
have you (or anyone else) recently changed the name of your sql server?
@@servername refers to the network name of the sql server, where as the servername property of SERVERPROPERTY...
May 26, 2004 at 3:32 pm
have you tried running the particular query the application is falling over on directly within query analyser (against the target database) to see if you replicate the issue or get the...
May 26, 2004 at 2:04 pm
can i just add one thing, although sp_attach_db is a very useful stored proc, it should never be relied upon to successfully attach database files to a server unless those...
May 26, 2004 at 1:54 pm
may i just raise my concerns that three of Steve's most recent QOD's have seemed to cause a number of areas of confusion within the group. i am in no way doubting...
April 19, 2004 at 2:02 pm
Jerome,
Sounds like a sensible solution, but have you thought of using SQL Server Log Shipping to maintain a warm backup server of your most critical database(s) / server(s) (you mention...
March 3, 2004 at 9:57 am
Thanx guys, much appreciated fhanlon you hit the nail on the head there, thats pretty much what i've come up with aswell, cheers...
March 2, 2004 at 5:21 pm
I think you've hit the nail on the head there Michelle, at present I am trying to persuade the "decision makers" in our buisness to make available more resources &...
January 28, 2004 at 12:17 pm
Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 100 total)